Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Debate: 13th-level PCs vs. 6- to 8-Encounter Adventuring Day
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6869794" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>By the rules if the PCs have sufficient cover, Stealth works against blindsight.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So it is a large pyramid. That's why my group likes things drawn out, so they understand the terrain which can sometimes be different in the DMs and players minds and affect play in a manner that leads to unhappiness and feelings of cheating by the DM. And yes, I've had to deal with this one as well, even though it was just a miscommunication.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Whether Stealth works against Blindsight is not up to the DM in a game between players and a DM that have agreed to follow the rules. Stealth works against Blindsight per Jeremy Crawford who defines the rules for D&D.</p><p></p><p>Now the part I will allow is what constitutes sufficient cover in a neutral game like this. That would be up to the DM as long as he was making reasonable decisions.</p><p></p><p>In a situation like this we're not sitting around your table where your word is law. This would be the equivalent of playing in an organized play scenario where the rules were agreed upon prior to play and must for the most part be officially sanctioned and followed.</p><p> </p><p>In this scenario I will give you the benefit of the doubt that a shadow dragon can hide effectively in this area. You were kind enough to give the bard a <em>gem of seeing</em> and she has Devilsight. This is one of those situations where it would see ample use and hopefully be very helpful spotting said dragon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my particular group the bard has the same visual range as the dragon and access to a <em>gem of seeing</em> and a really high stealth herself. I think is +10 without <em>pass without trace</em>. Then again my group doesn't have <em>pass without trace</em>, so no worries. But a +20 stealth check for the bard with the <em>gem of seeing</em> and devilsight gives her a good chance to see creatures hidden in really dark places. I'd hope you would consider that in your rulings.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It would be extremely difficult. I'm not going to lie. That dragon might get a vicious surprise round.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6869794, member: 5834"] By the rules if the PCs have sufficient cover, Stealth works against blindsight. So it is a large pyramid. That's why my group likes things drawn out, so they understand the terrain which can sometimes be different in the DMs and players minds and affect play in a manner that leads to unhappiness and feelings of cheating by the DM. And yes, I've had to deal with this one as well, even though it was just a miscommunication. Whether Stealth works against Blindsight is not up to the DM in a game between players and a DM that have agreed to follow the rules. Stealth works against Blindsight per Jeremy Crawford who defines the rules for D&D. Now the part I will allow is what constitutes sufficient cover in a neutral game like this. That would be up to the DM as long as he was making reasonable decisions. In a situation like this we're not sitting around your table where your word is law. This would be the equivalent of playing in an organized play scenario where the rules were agreed upon prior to play and must for the most part be officially sanctioned and followed. In this scenario I will give you the benefit of the doubt that a shadow dragon can hide effectively in this area. You were kind enough to give the bard a [I]gem of seeing[/I] and she has Devilsight. This is one of those situations where it would see ample use and hopefully be very helpful spotting said dragon. In my particular group the bard has the same visual range as the dragon and access to a [I]gem of seeing[/I] and a really high stealth herself. I think is +10 without [I]pass without trace[/I]. Then again my group doesn't have [I]pass without trace[/I], so no worries. But a +20 stealth check for the bard with the [I]gem of seeing[/I] and devilsight gives her a good chance to see creatures hidden in really dark places. I'd hope you would consider that in your rulings. It would be extremely difficult. I'm not going to lie. That dragon might get a vicious surprise round. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Debate: 13th-level PCs vs. 6- to 8-Encounter Adventuring Day
Top