Lord Zardoz
Explorer
Tal Rasha said:A good epic villain has to be at once powerful and mysterious. Some points to consider:
+ actions speak louder than words
+ moral ambiguity is good
+ Keep your villain a mystery for as long as possible
+ Villain must be a threat
I will agree with points 1, 3, and 4 as being useful. Point 2 is one I will nitpick on a bit.
Hannibal Lecter, the Joker, Jason Voorhees, and Emporer Palpatine do quite well with no moral ambiguity at all. Moral Ambiguity can be very effective, but it does not always fit. Noah Bennet (the horn rimmed glasses guy from Heroes) does quite well with Moral Ambiguity. But there is no moral ambiguity in Hannibal Lecter.
I think a better description of what you are describing is a Sympathetic Villain. Hannibal Lecter is an effective villain because he fills items 1, 3, and 4 of the above, and he is portrayed in a way that makes you want to like him. He is seductive, charismatic, and he is often motivated by a sense of poetic justice in his crimes. Also, he is just cool in alot of ways. However, I do not think there is much room for genuine moral ambiguity in his acts of murder and cannibalism. No sane and reasonable person would find his acts morally justifiable.
Also, there are some villain archtypes for which having a sympathetic villain would just not fit very well. Some of the best villains to ever be portrayed in fiction were not especially nuanced and subtle. The best example off the top of my head is the original Terminator.
Kyle Reese said:It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.
Not a sympathetic villain. Not at all a morally ambiguous villain. But undeniably one of the most effective movie villains ever. Not exactly an epic villain as written, but drop in the intelligence and resources of Skynet, and you have your epic villain.
END COMMUNICATION
Last edited: