Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 8242851" data-attributes="member: 4348">The higher ups say she was clear about it, and to commit fraud means that you have to be deceptive about something (ownership, your stakes in it, etc), but I cannot see why or how they'd have ever approved some of the things she did which put money into her own financial accounts.I suppose embezzlement would be the better word for it, but the way everything went with some of her personal interactions to get gain at TSR's expense just seem so insane I can't imagine anyone really approving such things.Obviously they did, but it just doesn't make a ton of sense for everyone else just to go along with it.&nbsp; At least to me.&nbsp; Those at the bottom had no choice, but the ones at the head of the company in the late 80s to the mid 90s just mystifies me looking back at it.&nbsp; It was absolutely unethical.&nbsp; Perhaps I'm just bitter a bit and feel something worse was going on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 8242851, member: 4348"] The higher ups say she was clear about it, and to commit fraud means that you have to be deceptive about something (ownership, your stakes in it, etc), but I cannot see why or how they'd have ever approved some of the things she did which put money into her own financial accounts. I suppose embezzlement would be the better word for it, but the way everything went with some of her personal interactions to get gain at TSR's expense just seem so insane I can't imagine anyone really approving such things. Obviously they did, but it just doesn't make a ton of sense for everyone else just to go along with it. At least to me. Those at the bottom had no choice, but the ones at the head of the company in the late 80s to the mid 90s just mystifies me looking back at it. It was absolutely unethical. Perhaps I'm just bitter a bit and feel something worse was going on. [/QUOTE]

Verification