Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Diplomacy Skill Check Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 2321506" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I pretty much agree. If you fall into the water, you are free to forgo a swim check. If you do, you automatically fail that swim check and sink. If you are riding a horse at a gallop in difficult terrain, you are free to forgo a ride check unless you wish to use that skill in some way - for example to stay on the horse. I won't make you use your ride skill, but the situation calls on a ride check and there are consequences if you don't. Likewise, if you running down an ice covered staircase, I the DM have no right to demand you make a balance skill check, but you better believe that if you choose to forgo that skill check there will be consequences. Likewise, if you are casting a spell under adverse conditions, noone is going to 'make' you make a Concentration check; but, if you choose to forgo that concentration check when the situation calls for one then well you don't get a spell. It's just that simple. Virtually every skill has this aspect. One is never required to move silently, but if one doesn't, then one isn't silent.</p><p></p><p>So if the Duchess comes up to you and says, "So, you are the hero that we have been hearing so many good things about?", you can stand there and stare the Duchess in the face without saying a word, but if you choose to do that then I assure you that you will have committed a major social faux pas. Choosing to forgo your Diplomacy check in a social situation is pretty much the same as automatically failing. In particular, I find the whole debate rather silly, because unless you are distracted, you can simply take 10 on a diplomacy check and be gauranteed not to make things worse. The socially awkward characters mutters out the briefest thing he can think of, "I-i-i d-don't know, ma'am, I mean..you Grace.", and the Duchess - if she has no particular reason to be irritated - just says something witty, smiles and moves on thinking the character to be an uncultured bore, but at least a highly useful one.</p><p></p><p>But the logic that you can get into a social situation and not have to make a charisma check of some sort <em>unless you want to</em> is utterly ridiculous. </p><p></p><p>I for one am getting really tired of this whole anything not expressly permitted by the rules is forbidden attitude. For crying out loud, if the DM can't request a low charisma character make a charisma check, what ever is the consequences of having a low charisma?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 2321506, member: 4937"] I pretty much agree. If you fall into the water, you are free to forgo a swim check. If you do, you automatically fail that swim check and sink. If you are riding a horse at a gallop in difficult terrain, you are free to forgo a ride check unless you wish to use that skill in some way - for example to stay on the horse. I won't make you use your ride skill, but the situation calls on a ride check and there are consequences if you don't. Likewise, if you running down an ice covered staircase, I the DM have no right to demand you make a balance skill check, but you better believe that if you choose to forgo that skill check there will be consequences. Likewise, if you are casting a spell under adverse conditions, noone is going to 'make' you make a Concentration check; but, if you choose to forgo that concentration check when the situation calls for one then well you don't get a spell. It's just that simple. Virtually every skill has this aspect. One is never required to move silently, but if one doesn't, then one isn't silent. So if the Duchess comes up to you and says, "So, you are the hero that we have been hearing so many good things about?", you can stand there and stare the Duchess in the face without saying a word, but if you choose to do that then I assure you that you will have committed a major social faux pas. Choosing to forgo your Diplomacy check in a social situation is pretty much the same as automatically failing. In particular, I find the whole debate rather silly, because unless you are distracted, you can simply take 10 on a diplomacy check and be gauranteed not to make things worse. The socially awkward characters mutters out the briefest thing he can think of, "I-i-i d-don't know, ma'am, I mean..you Grace.", and the Duchess - if she has no particular reason to be irritated - just says something witty, smiles and moves on thinking the character to be an uncultured bore, but at least a highly useful one. But the logic that you can get into a social situation and not have to make a charisma check of some sort [i]unless you want to[/i] is utterly ridiculous. I for one am getting really tired of this whole anything not expressly permitted by the rules is forbidden attitude. For crying out loud, if the DM can't request a low charisma character make a charisma check, what ever is the consequences of having a low charisma? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Diplomacy Skill Check Results
Top