Diplomatic Immunity: Almost Ready Maybe?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rystil Arden said:
BS:
[SBLOCK]

Well, that's what was going to happen either way, as I said before. It would be simple enough to say that Kalli didn't believe him and thought it was a trick.
[/SBLOCK]
RA: [sblock]*shrug* We would need to have the conversation before I can say that. [/sblock]
 

log in or register to remove this ad

BS:
[SBLOCK]
*shrug* We would need to have the conversation before I can say that.

Well, you just got finished saying that anything else would 'ruin your concept' right. So are you saying that if we had actually roleplayed out the conversation, and Kalli came out of it believing him to be a nice guy, that at that point, you would quit?
[/SBLOCK]
 

RA:[sblock]Mark, at no point did I say the word quit. Are you trying to ask me to leave the game? Cause your coming off damn rude when I’ve been nothing but polite during this issue.

As for you’re above question: I would be far more accepting of it, we are here to roleplay and people develop... It would be pretty pointless to play if they didn't. With that said it’s hard to accept a change when you’re not giving an option and the change doesn't come slowly through RP.

Again, you’ve have a 700 + intro for Bront and I suggested one for Unleash and I just to avoid this type of the problems so I feel my issues and complants are valid.

What happens if Kalli wants to refer to the previous conversation? It can’t be done cause we never had it.

Again, never having meet anyone who would be her friend, NPC or PC, would be optimal.

If that cannot be done never having has serious talked to the NPC would also work but only if it was typical slave buying talk. Name, age, race, etc.
[/sblock]
 



BS:
[SBLOCK]
If that's not possible than I don't really know what to do... I guess I can look at a new character concept cause this one will be changed if she has a friend.
This is more-or-less similar to quitting, but it isn't quite the same. I apologise for using the term quitting.

Again, you’ve have a 700 + intro for Bront

I didn't want to bring this up again, but since you did, I'd ask you to note that not only did Bront not fuss about where we started there (which added a bit to the end of his history), but he has mentioned several times that if anyone is ever waiting for him, I should feel free to immediately end his Preface and just tell him what happened.

What happens if Kalli wants to refer to the previous conversation? It can’t be done cause we never had it.

It can be done. It isn't as easy, true, but it's not impossible, and it happens all the time. We didn't roleplay out all of Molpe's conversations with Tifalia, but we didn't have a problem when they talked in DT.



Basically, there are three options here. I'm going to let you choose between options 2 and 3 (you'll see me categorically reject option 1 in a moment), since I had chosen option 3 before to try to be more convenient for you.

1) Roleplay all of Kalli's scenes but skip all of the other players until they meet up with Kalli.

Comments: I categorically reject option 1 because it is totally unfair to the other players.

2) Roleplay all of the characters and scenes, starting with Kalli's meeting with Catullus and eventually leading to the point I selected for (3).

Comments: There will most likely be several long stretches of waiting for Kalli where you don't get to post. By long, I mean it might even be a week or more, though I will of course try to minimise th waiting time as best I can.

3) Start at the point I selected previously.

Comments: This is the one I thought would be the best choice.
[/SBLOCK]
 




Unleashed and Kohbiel:

BS didn't want to start as late as we did, even though if we start earlier, then the other characters (that is--Ham and Tiberius) are going to get a lot of face-time when Kalli has to wait for posts and do nothing. Despite this, BS would prefer to start earlier. Is that OK with you guys?
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top