Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7266653" data-attributes="member: 12731">Know what? You're right. Just referring to &quot;canon&quot; is a poor justification for arguing something. That doesn't make the Discovery writers' sloppy decision-making look any better though.Nobody has responded to the quotes I made: that the show secretly wants to be part of the movie universe (and that's no secret; the look and feel, lighting, personal focus and pacing is much more like the movies than earlier shows), and/or that they secretly want to eat the cake (discover new worlds and techs) and have it too (the prequel with Klingons and the Spock family).It's all well and good to discuss individual highlights of the show, but that doesn't help when the overarching framework makes your head hurt.Sent from my C6603 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7266653, member: 12731"] Know what? You're right. Just referring to "canon" is a poor justification for arguing something. That doesn't make the Discovery writers' sloppy decision-making look any better though. Nobody has responded to the quotes I made: that the show secretly wants to be part of the movie universe (and that's no secret; the look and feel, lighting, personal focus and pacing is much more like the movies than earlier shows), and/or that they secretly want to eat the cake (discover new worlds and techs) and have it too (the prequel with Klingons and the Spock family). It's all well and good to discuss individual highlights of the show, but that doesn't help when the overarching framework makes your head hurt. Sent from my C6603 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification