Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Disdain for new fantasy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darth Shoju" data-source="post: 3765566" data-attributes="member: 11397"><p>I would agree that *enjoyment* is subjective, but that doesn't mean quality can't be judged with a certain degree of objectivity. Certainly one can examine how well a work accomplishes its goal (although what the goal is can be hard to determine) and the merit of the craft that went into producing it. </p><p></p><p>Examples:</p><p></p><p>I could write a fantasy novel with an excellent premise, but if the characters are shallow and cliched, or if the plot is poorly structured, or the grammar incorrect, its quality should be questioned. Now, there may still be elements to it that people find entertaining, and for that it can be said to have some quality, but it would be disingenuous to describe it as superlative. Good? Probably not. Entertaining? For some, possibly. But the shortcomings in the execution of the story will likely prevent many people from enjoying it. Since one of the goals of publishing a story is to entertain people, it would be accurate to say that this story failed in at least one of its goals. </p><p></p><p>For a further example, lets say that a new anime series is released and billed as "Naruto meets Ninja Scroll". Its goal is to be an entertaining and thought-provoking series about ninjas. However, if I discover that the characters and plots are literally a mish-mash of Naruto and Ninja Scroll, I would certainly be justified in questioning its quality. Now, I might find myself enjoying the show despite its shortcomings, but when describing it to someone I'd likely call it "fun but really derivative" (which, incidentally, is how I describe the band Wolfmother). </p><p></p><p>So really, art can -- and should -- be judged in the context of its own goals (and to an extent, within its own genre). Where things get sticky is when the piece in question largely meets those objective criteria; that is where you get into personal opinion being the deciding factor. That grey-area is why I avoid loudly proclaiming things as "crap"; not only is it frequently difficult to back such a claim up, but it tends to diminish the quality of my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darth Shoju, post: 3765566, member: 11397"] I would agree that *enjoyment* is subjective, but that doesn't mean quality can't be judged with a certain degree of objectivity. Certainly one can examine how well a work accomplishes its goal (although what the goal is can be hard to determine) and the merit of the craft that went into producing it. Examples: I could write a fantasy novel with an excellent premise, but if the characters are shallow and cliched, or if the plot is poorly structured, or the grammar incorrect, its quality should be questioned. Now, there may still be elements to it that people find entertaining, and for that it can be said to have some quality, but it would be disingenuous to describe it as superlative. Good? Probably not. Entertaining? For some, possibly. But the shortcomings in the execution of the story will likely prevent many people from enjoying it. Since one of the goals of publishing a story is to entertain people, it would be accurate to say that this story failed in at least one of its goals. For a further example, lets say that a new anime series is released and billed as "Naruto meets Ninja Scroll". Its goal is to be an entertaining and thought-provoking series about ninjas. However, if I discover that the characters and plots are literally a mish-mash of Naruto and Ninja Scroll, I would certainly be justified in questioning its quality. Now, I might find myself enjoying the show despite its shortcomings, but when describing it to someone I'd likely call it "fun but really derivative" (which, incidentally, is how I describe the band Wolfmother). So really, art can -- and should -- be judged in the context of its own goals (and to an extent, within its own genre). Where things get sticky is when the piece in question largely meets those objective criteria; that is where you get into personal opinion being the deciding factor. That grey-area is why I avoid loudly proclaiming things as "crap"; not only is it frequently difficult to back such a claim up, but it tends to diminish the quality of my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Disdain for new fantasy
Top