Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Darth Shoju" data-source="post: 3766006" data-attributes="member: 11397">Not really. There are still objective standards that can differentiate one work from another. You can say one guitarist is better than another by how they play their instrument (one may miss notes/chords that the other consistently hits). One writer may be far more effective at communicating ideas than another. Regardless of whether you accept that art can be "bad", it seems strange to me to claim that there is no objective way to claim something as being better than another.I tend to go with "of poor or inferior quality; defective; deficient". I'll agree that where you draw the line of "good vs bad" is somewhat subjective, but I also feel there comes a time when something is so inferior you just have to call it bad and leave it at that.</blockquote>