Dispel Magic on Magic Item Question

Gedvondur

First Post
Here’s a little question for you good folks. It’s regarding Dispel Magic in area form.

In my last game session, I had a rogue wearing a Ring of Invisibility, who had activated it in the previous round. In the current round, there was a Dispel Magic cast, in Area form.

The question is: Can the Invisibility effect granted by a Ring of Invisibility be dispelled by an area Dispel Magic?

My feeling is that using the Ring of Invisibility effectively casts the spell for you. The resulting invisibility effect is dis-spellable. He can certainly re-activate the item.

His contention is that the Dispel Magic spell, in the Area section, says that magic items are not affected by an area dispel.

In the case of items that produce an effect not duplicated by a book spell, or that have a constant effect (Bracers of Armor, etc) I would agree that those shouldn’t be dispelled by the area Dispel Magic affect.

But the Ring of Invisibility reproduces the Invisibility spell, and fit’s all the other criteria for dispelling it’s effect.

What do you all think?

I quoted the appropriate rules after my signature.


Gedvondur


From the 3rd Edition Players Handbook, Copyright Wizards of the Coast:

“Area Dispel: The spell affects everything within a 30-foot radius.
For each creature who is the target of one or more spells, you make a dispel check against the spell with the highest caster level. If that fails, you make dispel checks against progressively weaker spells until you dispel one spell (which discharges the dispel so far as that target is concerned) or fail all your checks. The creature’s magic items are not
affected.

For each object that is the target of one or more spells, you make dispel checks as with creatures. Magic items are not affected by area dispels. For each ongoing area or effect spell centered within the dispel magic’s area, you make a dispel check to dispel the
spell.

For each ongoing spell whose area overlaps that of the dispel, you make a dispel check to end the effect, but only within the area of the dispel magic.
If an object or creature who is the effect of an ongoing spell, such as a monster summoned by monster summoning, is in the area, you make a dispel check to end the spell that conjured the object or creature (returning it whence it came) in addition to attempting to dispel spells targeting the creature or object.

You may choose to automatically succeed at dispel checks against any spell that you have cast.”

From the 3rd Edition Dungeon Master’s Guide, Copyright Wizards of the Coast:

Rings:

“Invisibility

By activating this simple silver ring, the wearer can become invisible, as the spell.

Caster Level: 3rd; Prerequisites: Forge Ring, invisibility; Market Price: 20,000 gp.”
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I always had the same problem.... magical items are undispelable by the rules as I read it but wands DCs and so are lower than actually cast spells ....
 

First of all, welcome to the boards. :)

Gedvondur said:
Can the Invisibility effect granted by a Ring of Invisibility be dispelled by an area Dispel Magic?

No.

Gedvondur said:
My feeling is that using the Ring of Invisibility effectively casts the spell for you.

Sort of. A wand certainly "casts" a spell for you, but no so much in the case of the ring.

Gedvondur said:
His contention is that the Dispel Magic spell, in the Area section, says that magic items are not affected by an area dispel.

He would be correct.

Gedvondur said:
In the case of items that produce an effect not duplicated by a book spell, or that have a constant effect (Bracers of Armor, etc) I would agree that those shouldn’t be dispelled by the area Dispel Magic affect.

But the Ring of Invisibility reproduces the Invisibility spell, and fit’s all the other criteria for dispelling it’s effect.

What do you all think?

I think that it would be far to inconsistent (and just wierd) for Boots of Striding and Springing (which do not directly duplicate a spell) to be immune to area dispels when Boots of Speed (which do directly duplicate a spell) are not.
 
Last edited:

In order to affect the ring with dispel magic, you need to use a targeted dispel and specifically target the ring.

To target a spell, you need to be able to see or touch the target.

If you are able to see or touch the ring and sucessfully make the dispel check, then you succeed in suppressing the magic of the ring for 1d4 rounds. Hardly worth it, right? This is why magic items are so valuable.


Attempting to dispel a ring of invisibility is not a great strategy. Your best defense against the ring is a spell that defeats invisibility, like faerie fire, invisibility purge, glitterdust, or true seeing -- there are probably others.
 
Last edited:

I don't think there is a very firm rule stand for either case, but I would stick to "Area dispel does not affect magic items". This means that use activated/command and continous magic items are all treated the same.
 

Remove ads

Top