Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrassDragon" data-source="post: 9077842" data-attributes="member: 7791">This is going to be such a quaint thing a year or two from now, when everyone has AI copilots checking, editing, translating, filtering, converting and sprucing up their content just by virtue of the digital tools they're using daily. Generative AI will be in every smartphone, content-producing app and business tool. I'm sure there will be people who refuse to use it, just as we still have artists using an easle instead of a Wacom tablet and authors swearing by their Olivetti mechanical typewriter. But that'll just be the exception to the rule.These tools have only been mainstream for a year or so. Using it with artistry and creativity may be hard to imagine for many (especially because the signal to noise ratio is completely out of whack right now) but brilliant use cases are sure to be coming down the pipe as more creators get to grips with it.It's going to turn some of our best creators into productive powerhouses. I predict it won't be long before we're handing out ENnies to content mostly generated with the help of AI (although it may take a while longer for creators to feel safe openly admit they're using it.) The idea that we can detect generative AI-content or enforce labelling is already an illusion even with the crude models in circulation right now. The only reason we clock the output is because so many people use AI artlessly (e.g. using it for cloning and imitation rather than originality) and publish before reaching a minimal quality treshold.For now, the safer bet for creators and publishers is to be anti-AI in the RPG space. I don't think that's a sustainable or realistic position long-term.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrassDragon, post: 9077842, member: 7791"] This is going to be such a quaint thing a year or two from now, when everyone has AI copilots checking, editing, translating, filtering, converting and sprucing up their content just by virtue of the digital tools they're using daily. Generative AI will be in every smartphone, content-producing app and business tool. I'm sure there will be people who refuse to use it, just as we still have artists using an easle instead of a Wacom tablet and authors swearing by their Olivetti mechanical typewriter. But that'll just be the exception to the rule. These tools have only been mainstream for a year or so. Using it with artistry and creativity may be hard to imagine for many (especially because the signal to noise ratio is completely out of whack right now) but brilliant use cases are sure to be coming down the pipe as more creators get to grips with it. It's going to turn some of our best creators into productive powerhouses. I predict it won't be long before we're handing out ENnies to content mostly generated with the help of AI (although it may take a while longer for creators to feel safe openly admit they're using it.) The idea that we can detect generative AI-content or enforce labelling is already an illusion even with the crude models in circulation right now. The only reason we clock the output is because so many people use AI artlessly (e.g. using it for cloning and imitation rather than originality) and publish before reaching a minimal quality treshold. For now, the safer bet for creators and publishers is to be anti-AI in the RPG space. I don't think that's a sustainable or realistic position long-term. [/QUOTE]

Verification