Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mirtek" data-source="post: 9080581" data-attributes="member: 40810">Every artist is trained on copyrighted material. Everything that she saw from the moment she was old enough to comprehend it to the moment she started creating art has been influencing here. No artist starts of from an vacuum.AI will march onward and paltry attempts such as this will not stop it. The manual laborers during swing riots and the maschinenstürmer did physically smash the machines that were taking their jobs into pieces and yet it did nothing to slow down automatisation.An illustrator or (voice) actor is not any better or worse than some faceless accountant in some back office cubicle. AI will take most of their jobs within the next decade. I am a financial analyst and I don't expect my job to survive until 2040 (at latest).People making a fuss about entertainment products replacing artists with AI but will not bat an eye about buying some everyday products from a company that replaced 80% of their accountants with AI.&nbsp;Back when automatisation was causing the great depletion in the numbers of workers manning the factory floors the creative and office jobs were hailed as the ones that would survive. Now technology advanced and becomes ever more capable of taking those jobs too.Sucks for us doing those jobs, but so it did for 100 threshers that could replaced by 5 threshing machines, factory floors full of weavers that got replaced by weaving machines, ....., the list just goes on and on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mirtek, post: 9080581, member: 40810"] Every artist is trained on copyrighted material. Everything that she saw from the moment she was old enough to comprehend it to the moment she started creating art has been influencing here. No artist starts of from an vacuum. AI will march onward and paltry attempts such as this will not stop it. The manual laborers during swing riots and the maschinenstürmer did physically smash the machines that were taking their jobs into pieces and yet it did nothing to slow down automatisation. An illustrator or (voice) actor is not any better or worse than some faceless accountant in some back office cubicle. AI will take most of their jobs within the next decade. I am a financial analyst and I don't expect my job to survive until 2040 (at latest). People making a fuss about entertainment products replacing artists with AI but will not bat an eye about buying some everyday products from a company that replaced 80% of their accountants with AI. Back when automatisation was causing the great depletion in the numbers of workers manning the factory floors the creative and office jobs were hailed as the ones that would survive. Now technology advanced and becomes ever more capable of taking those jobs too. Sucks for us doing those jobs, but so it did for 100 threshers that could replaced by 5 threshing machines, factory floors full of weavers that got replaced by weaving machines, ....., the list just goes on and on. [/QUOTE]

Verification