Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EOL" data-source="post: 47108" data-attributes="member: 823">This to me comes out of left field, did I miss some horrible personal insult, what part of my post struck you as rude?Let's take it from the top.  I said:This is in response to your claim that:Now it is certainly true that I introduced the idea of disadvantages to balance these feats, but it seems something of an about face to later claim:Which current feats do you intend to put to an "interesting use" to model the barbarian?  Or perhaps you're suggesting that in your redesigned 3e there would be exactly the same number of feats.  In that case which feats would you cut?As far as this is concerned:You seem to have planted your flag on a piece of ground that is very close to the way it already is.  There seems a very fine line between Barbarian's being a sub-class of Fighters and Barbarians being a class unto themselves.  A little bit of wording is all, it would seem to me.Finally:I think that's an exagerration.  I grant that I may have extrapolated from your posts, but I think it's clear that additional feats would be required.I agree this:Was uncalled for, and a knee jerk reaction to some posts which have advocated that.  I not only retract it, but I offer my apology.As far as your claim of:That was uncalled for.</blockquote>