Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Henadic Theologian" data-source="post: 9588964" data-attributes="member: 7030526">If this poll is any indication I think there will be changes made, but I don't think the Purple Dragon Knight will get completely scrapped, or the concept of riding dragons will get tossed, but revisions will need to be made, so I expect to see this in another UA. I think some of the features will be altered to be more party supporting then just Dragon mount supporting. I think they will have to do a better job of explaining WHY Purple Dragon Knights are riding Dragons, especially such exotic Gem Dragons, now when there was no history of doing so in the past. &quot;Context is for Kings.&quot;&nbsp;Looking at the other polls I did, I think the rest of the subclasses will be fine, although Spellfire Sorcerer might get buffed especially in terms of damage. Maybe a few other weeks here &amp; there. &nbsp;I don't expect any of the subclasses will get ditched this time.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Henadic Theologian, post: 9588964, member: 7030526"] If this poll is any indication I think there will be changes made, but I don't think the Purple Dragon Knight will get completely scrapped, or the concept of riding dragons will get tossed, but revisions will need to be made, so I expect to see this in another UA. I think some of the features will be altered to be more party supporting then just Dragon mount supporting. I think they will have to do a better job of explaining WHY Purple Dragon Knights are riding Dragons, especially such exotic Gem Dragons, now when there was no history of doing so in the past. "Context is for Kings." Looking at the other polls I did, I think the rest of the subclasses will be fine, although Spellfire Sorcerer might get buffed especially in terms of damage. Maybe a few other weeks here & there. I don't expect any of the subclasses will get ditched this time. [/QUOTE]

Verification