Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 8862596" data-attributes="member: 12251">I think those are just called "transactions"; there hasn't been anything "micro" about them for decades!That interests me more than any VTT. Another thing that I have thought would be cool for online tools (and to be fair DDB may already do some or all of this) is creating not just individual characters but grouping them into a party. So the GM can give XP to the party and it is automatically distributed (or just click "Level Up" if using milestones). And similarly with loot, it goes into a central pot until people claim items - ideally with support for specifying who is carrying the unassigned party loot for encumbrance purposes.Obviously, it would need to be optional, as a single party with consistent membership does not fit all playstyles, but it would be nice for those it does suit.[HR][/HR]As for the actual poll: I voted "Maybe" but like a couple of other posters it was "maybe, leaning quite strongly towards no". I have so far avoided VTTs as not worth the hassle, and this is likely to be even more hassle (and costlier to). But keeping track of highly-3d fights (especially airborne or under water) is something that can be difficult even on a real tabletop, and might be something that the VVT can do that I cannot do ten times easier in Google Slides (unlike 2d battle maps). But for it to be worth it for that occasional use case, it would have to be very easy and very cheap, and it seems unlikely to be either of those things.</blockquote>

Verification