Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Doctors & Daleks - Cubicle 7 Brings Doctor Who to D&D 5E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 8554766" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>I think the game is acceptably fine 9-12. There are some 5th and 6th level spells that are questionable, but by and large there isn't anything that bothers me.</p><p></p><p>The trouble is that non-primary spellcasters characters above level 12 still scale their normal combat abilities, but they do so in generally marginal ways. They still expect to solve problems with attack rolls, damage dice, rider effects, and skill checks.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, spellcasters warp reality. At level 13+, there are spells that allow wholly orthogonal solutions not just to encounters, but to <em>whole adventures</em>. They solve the game from the character sheet in anti-climactic and undramatic ways. I'm not a fan of essentially every high level spell as presented.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I don't think the game wants to or should scale into comic book superhero levels. It's perfectly fine to want to play a game where the characters do that. I don't think it's D&D because non-primary spellcasters don't <em>and never have</em>. AD&D was built around domain management above name level. In other words, they told you to stop playing D&D. Only video games work in AD&D at high level because video games can limit player choice and force them into basically standard combat. In 3e and 5e both they've found that nobody plays the game at high level because it's (a) too hard to DM because of the spellcaster, and (b) not fun for non-primary spellcasters. 4e circumvented the issue and took levels 5 to 9 and spread them over 30 levels. I think it's well past time to just admit that high level casters don't fit in the game.</p><p></p><p>The real problem, is the spells above 6th level. From the PHB's 7th level spells:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Teleport. Far too potent for far too little cost. If any spell were a poster child for having an expensive material cost, it would be teleport. The lower level transport spells have their own somewhat onerous requirements, so I don't have much problem with them. Teleport is just too good. This effect as presented should never exist.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Resurrection (and True Resurrection). These probably need to exist, but I don't see much reason for them to not just be ways to cast Raise Dead with more expensive materials. 500gp for every 10 days the creature has been dead is fine. I just don't have a problem with death being a prohibitively expensive barrier to cross. I can't remember a single instance when these spells were necessary to a campaign except when a PC were disintegrated or turned to undead. Making Raise Dead just cost 5 or 10 times more in those cases seems fine. Further, I rather like the idea that you might need to visit the afterlife to communicate with people who died decades or centuries ago. Like... I don't know that I can even count the number of stories where visiting the afterlife is a major quest and story point. I feel like these spells rob the game of that. The more I think about it, I'm not even sure that Raise Dead should be a <em>spell</em>, per se. It should be an open ritual available to any class of sufficient level who knows the process.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Forcecage. This spell is dumb. It's way too good, and can be used to trivialize almost any high level encounter. And it's a CHA save for what reason? It does have an expensive material cost, but the spell doesn't say it consumes it so it basically doesn't <em>really</em> have an expensive material cost.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Plane Shift. Honestly, this is probably <em>too high</em> a level. The game does need a way for planar travel to occur, but I'm not convinced it should be a high level spell at all. Again, it feels like the game is robbing the players of something here. I feel like this spell in particular should be a ritual or process available to all PCs above 10th level (like Raise Dead). Yeah, it's magic. But the game shouldn't make <em>all</em> magic the sole purview of a few classes, especially when it's essential magic. It doesn't do that with skills or martial prowess anymore.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Simulacrum. This spell is dumb. It's primary purpose is abusive to the action economy and class design. I have no problem with a simulacrum being a type of construct that PCs can make, like an advanced homunculus or golem, especially for narrative purposes. It should never work like this spell does. Simulacrum should be an entry in the Monster Manual like golems are, and those entries should describe (roughly or in detail) how they are constructed.</li> </ul><p>The rest of the 7th level spells are either badly scaling fireballs with novel areas of effect, or spells that effectively replicate magic items, or spells that are so narrow that they basically don't exist.</p><p></p><p>There are <em>no </em>8th level spells that need to exist. All of them from the PHB are either redundant (telepathy, glibness, clone), grossly too effective at solving problems (demiplane, mind blank, clone), or so narrow as to be nearly pointless (tsunami, clone). The only two I can imagine being salvageable are Animal Shapes and Control Weather, both of which could be open rituals or Druid class abilities. The rest of them I wish did not exist.</p><p></p><p>For 9th level spells, it's the same problem as 8th level. Redundant (astral projection, meteor swarm), grossly too effective (gate, shapechange), or so narrow as to be pointless (imprisonment, weird). There is <em>one</em> effect worth saving: Wish. Wish should probably be limited to 20th level PCs, and should basically only exist because it's D&D and the wish effect <em>has</em> to exist in D&D because it's D&D. I'd be perfectly happy with wish being a boon granted by major powers or magic items. The rest of the 9th level spells add <em>nothing</em> good to the game. They do not need to exist as generally available effects or abilities. Most of them could be made into magic items or open rituals, which then gives the PCs something to quest for if they need that power.</p><p></p><p>The types of challenges the above spells are built to solve don't exist in the Monster Manual. They don't exist in <em>any</em> Monster Manual. And the characters that don't have access to those spells have <em>no</em> means of solving those kinds of problems.</p><p></p><p>So I would take all the 7th through 9th level spells, with the exceptions noted above, and move them to epic level. They don't belong with the rest of the game. That means Bard, Cleric, Druid, Sorcerer, Warlock, and Wizard need 3 new high level abilities at 13th, 15th, and 17th level. I'm inclined to make them feats or ASIs until I found something better for them to do.</p><p></p><p>I don't think that's a good design, but I think it's a <em>better</em> design with a <em>better</em> starting point than how 5e stands now. I think that makes high level play instantly more accessible for DMs.</p><p></p><p>Yes, this change does mean the game scales very slowly at higher levels. But it already does for the other classes! Attribute bonuses are uneven. For levels 1-10, most characters will go from +3 to +5 attribute bonus, and +2 to +4 proficiency bonus. +4 over 10 levels. Above level 10 (arguably above level 9), you get just another +2, so it's +2 over 10 levels. The game <em>doesn't</em> build in magic item bonuses anymore (nor should it) so this is the par. The game already slows down. Non-primary spellcaster already never truly reach tier 4.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 8554766, member: 6777737"] I think the game is acceptably fine 9-12. There are some 5th and 6th level spells that are questionable, but by and large there isn't anything that bothers me. The trouble is that non-primary spellcasters characters above level 12 still scale their normal combat abilities, but they do so in generally marginal ways. They still expect to solve problems with attack rolls, damage dice, rider effects, and skill checks. Meanwhile, spellcasters warp reality. At level 13+, there are spells that allow wholly orthogonal solutions not just to encounters, but to [I]whole adventures[/I]. They solve the game from the character sheet in anti-climactic and undramatic ways. I'm not a fan of essentially every high level spell as presented. Frankly, I don't think the game wants to or should scale into comic book superhero levels. It's perfectly fine to want to play a game where the characters do that. I don't think it's D&D because non-primary spellcasters don't [I]and never have[/I]. AD&D was built around domain management above name level. In other words, they told you to stop playing D&D. Only video games work in AD&D at high level because video games can limit player choice and force them into basically standard combat. In 3e and 5e both they've found that nobody plays the game at high level because it's (a) too hard to DM because of the spellcaster, and (b) not fun for non-primary spellcasters. 4e circumvented the issue and took levels 5 to 9 and spread them over 30 levels. I think it's well past time to just admit that high level casters don't fit in the game. The real problem, is the spells above 6th level. From the PHB's 7th level spells: [LIST] [*]Teleport. Far too potent for far too little cost. If any spell were a poster child for having an expensive material cost, it would be teleport. The lower level transport spells have their own somewhat onerous requirements, so I don't have much problem with them. Teleport is just too good. This effect as presented should never exist. [*]Resurrection (and True Resurrection). These probably need to exist, but I don't see much reason for them to not just be ways to cast Raise Dead with more expensive materials. 500gp for every 10 days the creature has been dead is fine. I just don't have a problem with death being a prohibitively expensive barrier to cross. I can't remember a single instance when these spells were necessary to a campaign except when a PC were disintegrated or turned to undead. Making Raise Dead just cost 5 or 10 times more in those cases seems fine. Further, I rather like the idea that you might need to visit the afterlife to communicate with people who died decades or centuries ago. Like... I don't know that I can even count the number of stories where visiting the afterlife is a major quest and story point. I feel like these spells rob the game of that. The more I think about it, I'm not even sure that Raise Dead should be a [I]spell[/I], per se. It should be an open ritual available to any class of sufficient level who knows the process. [*]Forcecage. This spell is dumb. It's way too good, and can be used to trivialize almost any high level encounter. And it's a CHA save for what reason? It does have an expensive material cost, but the spell doesn't say it consumes it so it basically doesn't [I]really[/I] have an expensive material cost. [*]Plane Shift. Honestly, this is probably [I]too high[/I] a level. The game does need a way for planar travel to occur, but I'm not convinced it should be a high level spell at all. Again, it feels like the game is robbing the players of something here. I feel like this spell in particular should be a ritual or process available to all PCs above 10th level (like Raise Dead). Yeah, it's magic. But the game shouldn't make [I]all[/I] magic the sole purview of a few classes, especially when it's essential magic. It doesn't do that with skills or martial prowess anymore. [*]Simulacrum. This spell is dumb. It's primary purpose is abusive to the action economy and class design. I have no problem with a simulacrum being a type of construct that PCs can make, like an advanced homunculus or golem, especially for narrative purposes. It should never work like this spell does. Simulacrum should be an entry in the Monster Manual like golems are, and those entries should describe (roughly or in detail) how they are constructed. [/LIST] The rest of the 7th level spells are either badly scaling fireballs with novel areas of effect, or spells that effectively replicate magic items, or spells that are so narrow that they basically don't exist. There are [I]no [/I]8th level spells that need to exist. All of them from the PHB are either redundant (telepathy, glibness, clone), grossly too effective at solving problems (demiplane, mind blank, clone), or so narrow as to be nearly pointless (tsunami, clone). The only two I can imagine being salvageable are Animal Shapes and Control Weather, both of which could be open rituals or Druid class abilities. The rest of them I wish did not exist. For 9th level spells, it's the same problem as 8th level. Redundant (astral projection, meteor swarm), grossly too effective (gate, shapechange), or so narrow as to be pointless (imprisonment, weird). There is [I]one[/I] effect worth saving: Wish. Wish should probably be limited to 20th level PCs, and should basically only exist because it's D&D and the wish effect [I]has[/I] to exist in D&D because it's D&D. I'd be perfectly happy with wish being a boon granted by major powers or magic items. The rest of the 9th level spells add [I]nothing[/I] good to the game. They do not need to exist as generally available effects or abilities. Most of them could be made into magic items or open rituals, which then gives the PCs something to quest for if they need that power. The types of challenges the above spells are built to solve don't exist in the Monster Manual. They don't exist in [I]any[/I] Monster Manual. And the characters that don't have access to those spells have [I]no[/I] means of solving those kinds of problems. So I would take all the 7th through 9th level spells, with the exceptions noted above, and move them to epic level. They don't belong with the rest of the game. That means Bard, Cleric, Druid, Sorcerer, Warlock, and Wizard need 3 new high level abilities at 13th, 15th, and 17th level. I'm inclined to make them feats or ASIs until I found something better for them to do. I don't think that's a good design, but I think it's a [I]better[/I] design with a [I]better[/I] starting point than how 5e stands now. I think that makes high level play instantly more accessible for DMs. Yes, this change does mean the game scales very slowly at higher levels. But it already does for the other classes! Attribute bonuses are uneven. For levels 1-10, most characters will go from +3 to +5 attribute bonus, and +2 to +4 proficiency bonus. +4 over 10 levels. Above level 10 (arguably above level 9), you get just another +2, so it's +2 over 10 levels. The game [I]doesn't[/I] build in magic item bonuses anymore (nor should it) so this is the par. The game already slows down. Non-primary spellcaster already never truly reach tier 4. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Doctors & Daleks - Cubicle 7 Brings Doctor Who to D&D 5E
Top