Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest User" data-source="post: 8141376">[USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] ...when Mistwell states this:Then, I believe that he himself has opened the door to discuss how stridently he defends TM's viewpoint.  I've been clear: in a resource tight game, that is intended to be very challenging to players, I believe the subclass has easily exploitable liabilities.In games where that is not the case, I have stated the subclass is fine.In response, Mist said this:[USER=177]@Umbran[/USER], is that response not personal, and not addressing the points I made?  I would prefer to handle this via PM.  However, the public red text, means I am doing this comment in public, as a balance.Many parties to this thread are "making it personal".  I will leave it there, and will not be making it personal, in the future.</blockquote>