Does Star Wars work well with Sandbox campaigns?

[Aldarc]

You need to have some structure, but it doesn't have to be a narrative one. Campaigns with procedual structures can also work very well, like Blades in the Dark or Classic Dungeon Crawling.

FitD: Scum & Villainy
OSR: Stars Without Number

Either way, but not limited to these two, should make a decent basis for a sandbox Star Wars game.

 

[Ovinomancer]

You need to have some structure, but it doesn't have to be a narrative one. Campaigns with procedual structures can also work very well, like Blades in the Dark or Classic Dungeon Crawling.

Blades does not have a procedural structure.

 

[Ovinomancer]

FitD: Scum & Villainy
OSR: Stars Without Number

Either way, but not limited to these two, should make a decent basis for a sandbox Star Wars game.

Scum and Villainy isn't going to deliver anything resembling a Trad or Classic sandbox experience. Just as a heads up -- very different structure to play. I wouldn't call any Forged in the Dark game a sandbox (or PbtA, for that matter).

(and I know you know this @Aldarc, just mentioning it for the OP)

 

[Yora]

Blades does not have a procedural structure.

Scores, engagement rolls, crew types, claims, downtime, that kind of things. It's a very structured game.

 

[Ovinomancer]

Scores, engagement rolls, crew types, claims, downtime, that kind of things. It's a very structured game.

Structured doesn't mean procedural, though. Plenty of games have structure but are not procedural (in face, few are actually procedural at all).

Using the random dungeon creation charts in the 5e DMG creates a procedural game, for instance.

 

[aramis erak]

Every so often I'm coming back to an idea to run a Star Wars campaign. And the point where I usually don't make much progress is in deciding on a game structure to hold the campaign together. [snip]
So I am thinking, if the goal is to run a campaign that embodies and evokes the style of Star Wars stories, is a sandbox even a suitable structure to build it around?

Open world and unscripted stories does not have to mean PCs with no assigned goal. You can still assign the players a task that they have to pursue, for which many clues and hints are set out for them to discover, but not plot any path or plan for them to follow. Such a campaign structure would make the PCs more reactive than proactive but still provide them with a great degree of agency.

Thoughts on this?

Star Wars using current canon? No. It's too broad and with too high travel speeds to work well as an open world game.

Star Wars with OT only, restricted to a prepared cluster or 2? Yeah, it can work... noting that travel times were NOT explicit in the OT... but the sequel trilogy gives us some inanely fast hops....

The other issue is that it has news travelling faster than people... which is blithely ignored in the writer's room when it should result in main characters getting shot resisting arrest by a stormtrooper platoon.... but not when it would be to the main characters' advantage.

 

[Committed Hero]

With the Star Wars setting I think you'd have to be as precise with time as with location. You have some pretty powerful NPCs who are making lots of changes, while other planets seem to not change at all regardless of the era.

 

[Staffan]

One of the most fun games I've run was a Star Wars semi-sandbox based on the material in the Age of Rebellion beginner game and associated web enhancement. The adventure in the Beginner Game is about taking over an off-the-books Imperial spy base, and the web enhancement is then about actually getting it up and running by making alliances with locals, acquiring equipment, while at the same time trying to stay under the Empire's radar so neither the Empire proper nor the Moff who commissioned it finds out and can take it back. It's a pretty small sandbox, there's a clear direction, and it does include some scripted events, but running it was one of the best times I've had.

For a more proper sandbox, I think Edge of the Empire would probably be the best fit out of FFG's offerings. But I think it works best if you have a clear overarching goal, even if PCs can have their own agendas on the side.

 

[aramis erak]

Every so often I'm coming back to an idea to run a Star Wars campaign. And the point where I usually don't make much progress is in deciding on a game structure to hold the campaign together.
In principle, I am a very outspoken proponent of sandbox campaigns in which the players roam around at their own volition. That's what RPGs are really made for as a medium.

That's what SOME RPGs are meant for. As a medium, it's got a lot of room for other modes. Mission based game settings abound.

So I am thinking, if the goal is to run a campaign that embodies and evokes the style of Star Wars stories, is a sandbox even a suitable structure to build it around?

Within a limited scope, yes, one can pull off a sandbox... provided one gets player agreement not to leave the box for the rest of the yard.

Set up a small cluster (10-12 worlds and 30 to 40 discrete locations to have specific assets you want them to consider, and add more as needed.

So,
Atzerri - world - temperate, 3 continents: Landfall, Northshield, and the Archipelago (Think austronesia/oceania, but bigger archipelago, with nothing bigger than Sumatra or NZ.)
Atzer City - Manufacturing and shipping center of the sector, Equatorial on Landfall. GM notes: Houses imperial offices for BOSS and ImpSec. Moff's offices in Atzerdu system, 3 LD away, or 10 min beyond light at ×1.
Northshield Mining Region - hundreds of mines with miners living in track-laying RVs (like shorter, wider, sandcrawlers).

For building the astrogation gazetteer, I'd suggest using a grid of "1 hour at ×1 beyond light" under "perfect conditions" - 3d grid out... then use the hypotenuse to figure out the straight line distance, and multiply that by a random factor; I'd set it as 2d10kL1. If you have a system in a nebula, or forgotten by the Republic and Empire, use 2d10kH1 for its links. If a forgotten world, also keep it off the player copy of the map.
Remember, in 3D, D=√((x₁-x₂)²+(y₁-y₂)²+(z₁-z₂)²)

 

[Umbran]

That's what RPGs are really made for as a medium.

Well, I disagree with this point, but that's a bit of an aside...

So I am thinking, if the goal is to run a campaign that embodies and evokes the style of Star Wars stories, is a sandbox even a suitable structure to build it around?

So, that depends on how you are defining your sandbox.

Open world and unscripted stories does not have to mean PCs with no assigned goal. You can still assign the players a task that they have to pursue, for which many clues and hints are set out for them to discover, but not plot any path or plan for them to follow. Such a campaign structure would make the PCs more reactive than proactive but still provide them with a great degree of agency.

Thoughts on this?

My thoughts are that the things I've bolded, above, are the things that tend to lead to games feeling less sandboxy. Basically, you have it backwartds.

You don't give them assignments and tasks. You make sure that, in character generation, they have a theme or goal for the party as a whole, and that the individual characters have their own individual goals and themes to follow as well.

Then, populate the sandbox such that a great many things there are relevant to those goals and themes. They get to choose how they navigate, but finding their way to stuff that will, when all is said and done, look like a story arc will be easy.