Fiendish Dire Weasel said:On that note, why doesn't it stack automaticly?
JustKim said:I didn't mean to argue politics, but obviously the issue was too close to political. It won't happen again.
dlane001 said:Yeah, I'm gonna let my Dragon sub drop as well.... Can't stand having to wait three weeks or more for my sub to come, when it is sitting right there on the rack. Guess I'm one of those immediate gratification type guys.
JustKim said:It's not my intention to bring politics into this, no. In fact the reason I find it distasteful is that the phrase is so clearly political at this time. I know that I personally will have a hard time reading the spell when I get the magazine and not seeing some sort of political affirmation in it, and I'd rather something like that not be in the magazine at all. Is it really so difficult not to name a spell "shock and awe" to avoid the political connotation?
This is the spell used during the surprise round only to keep someone flat-footed.Rahkan said:I'm Rahul Kanakia, I wrote the offending article (yes I did look in this post just to find my name) and none of my spells was originally titled "shock and awe". I haven't seen the issue yet, so I don't know which spell they renamed, but please do not hate on me.
Ant said:A solid issue though I was in two minds over "Mordenkainen's Art of War!" While I enjoyed the meta-gaming tactics discussed I was hoping for something a bit more, well, Mordenkainenesque. It looks like the editing staff were looking for a snappy headline for what could be seen as a slightly dry article and decided to slap the moniker of Greyhawk's favourite mage on it.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.