Alzrius
The EN World kitten
Whizbang Dustyboots said:Congratulations on getting your first Dragon article published.
Thanks! I'm pretty over the moon about it. Now I just need to send more stuff in.
Nightfall said:Al, is there ANY mention of Orcus?
Sorry, no love for our favorite demon prince this time, Nightfall.
demiurge1138 said:Who did the art for the Creature Catalog article?
John Gravato, Ramon Perez, and James Zhang. It doesn't seem to be more specific about who did what, though.
LoneWolf23 said:It's about anything Eberron-related, written by Keith Baker.
It's not always by Keith; this month's is by Nicolas Logue, for example.
Kobold Avenger said:I thought they got those virtues wrong, then I looked it up and saw there's at least 3 different types of seven virtues.
The sidebar on their opposing sins mentions that the seven deadly sins have remained relatively universal since they were conceived, the opposing virtues have fluctuated a little more; it then notes that the virtues listed here are the ones defined by the Roman Catholic Church.
PrinceXaxor said:Wait, wait. There's now a Psionic Class Act in Dragon? This makes me happy. I just hope that it becomes a permanent fixture of the magazine.
I hope so, but I doubt it. This isn't the first time that category has appeared, but it's never become permanent yet.
Razz said:I hope the Dragon staff pay close attention to that!![]()
What was their reply? I'm curious now. I hope it's good news.
Sadly, no. They note how much space it'd take to print full stat blocks for the hierarch modrons (nine of them, plus larger stat blocks for higher-level monsters). They then reference the tertian modron in Dungeon #144, and the Primus vestige in Dragon #341. Finally, they refer you to the Manual of the Planes web enhancement wih the 3.0 modrons.
Razz said:Can someone tell me if the Maedar is what I think it is? The male medusa from 2e?
Indeed it is! It even has a section talking about how it can become a glyptar!

Shemeska said:Does the Devourer Ecology delve into the whole "it's explicitely not undead" versus "it's undead" difference between its 2e and 3e incarnation?
Sorry Shemmy, he goes with a full retcon; they're undead, and always have been.
Oddly, he notes that the first devourer (a githyanki) apparently destroyed the "previous" Lich Queen Vlaakith (it's intimated that each such ruler was a lich), which strikes me as odd...I was under the impression that only the most recent Vlaakith became a lich.