Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 397 - Table of Contents
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5485748" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>How exactly is there any room to question whether this is 'advertising' or not? It's on their website and is the first thing that pops up if a non-subscriber scrolls over the Dungeon magazine icon... what exactly is unclear about this? I mean are you saying WotC has no idea they have this up on their companies website or something?</p><p> </p><p>On the second note, I am not arguing what was scheduled... I am arguing what was provided...2-3 adventyures were not provided in February plain and simple... and the ToC is up for 188... I mean sheesh, even Mearls stepped up and admitted they didn't provide any adventures in this month's Dungeon... so I guess the company itself admitting they didn't provide what they claimed to offer also isn't enough proof?</p><p> </p><p>Finally, it's not about whether they offer you a refund if you ask for it (they should actually give an automatic refund to customers if they failed to provide what they advertised as services provided), that's still incoveniencing me and creating extra work that I have to do to right something they did wrong. Honestly they are being dishonest in their advertising of Dungeon right now and it is in no way "low" to call them on it... WotC isn't my buddy or friend it's a company that took my money for services it was suppose to provide... services according to their own advertisement and admission (by Mearls) they didn't provide.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Really are we really painting with the "perspective" brush?? So is there anything wrong with people saying they would like the amount of material that was stated on WotC's advertisement on their site for Dungeon, that they saw before signing up? I mean you can try and paint this as blowing things out of perspective if you want but when money is involved it's all business... I don't fund WotC out of the kindness of my heart the same way I don't expect them to give me stuff for free... it works both ways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 5485748, member: 48965"] How exactly is there any room to question whether this is 'advertising' or not? It's on their website and is the first thing that pops up if a non-subscriber scrolls over the Dungeon magazine icon... what exactly is unclear about this? I mean are you saying WotC has no idea they have this up on their companies website or something? On the second note, I am not arguing what was scheduled... I am arguing what was provided...2-3 adventyures were not provided in February plain and simple... and the ToC is up for 188... I mean sheesh, even Mearls stepped up and admitted they didn't provide any adventures in this month's Dungeon... so I guess the company itself admitting they didn't provide what they claimed to offer also isn't enough proof? Finally, it's not about whether they offer you a refund if you ask for it (they should actually give an automatic refund to customers if they failed to provide what they advertised as services provided), that's still incoveniencing me and creating extra work that I have to do to right something they did wrong. Honestly they are being dishonest in their advertising of Dungeon right now and it is in no way "low" to call them on it... WotC isn't my buddy or friend it's a company that took my money for services it was suppose to provide... services according to their own advertisement and admission (by Mearls) they didn't provide. Really are we really painting with the "perspective" brush?? So is there anything wrong with people saying they would like the amount of material that was stated on WotC's advertisement on their site for Dungeon, that they saw before signing up? I mean you can try and paint this as blowing things out of perspective if you want but when money is involved it's all business... I don't fund WotC out of the kindness of my heart the same way I don't expect them to give me stuff for free... it works both ways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 397 - Table of Contents
Top