Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8837635" data-attributes="member: 67338">I loved it because the entire argument is about how to improve the setting... and as he said &quot;yes that would have improved this&quot;I kind of agree... spelljammer is dumb. It's fun dumb though (IMO) I like the new one okay I just wish we got more rules.again... you misunderstand...even stories I LOVE that are 20,30,50, over 100 years old if remade today I would HOPE they would fix. There is a book I read in HS called &quot;Killing Mr Griffin&quot; and one part about it ages perfectly. The teacher Mr Griffin assigns what his students (and I at the time) thought was impossible. basicly it is to improve on Shakespeare... (add to it but make it work to be exact) and now I realize. Like every writer every story there are flaws... things that years of reading and rereading you can find and even a lesser writer CAN fix. This then turns into a problem some of the writers I know run into... they don't want to hand in a script/manuscript/story because if they let it sit a week then reread it they will find things to fix. They need to learn 'good enough' and that it will never be perfect.I promise my favorite story, your favorite story, and any other story ever put to print if given decades of readers taking it apart and putting it back together you will find things that can be fixed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GMforPowergamers, post: 8837635, member: 67338"] I loved it because the entire argument is about how to improve the setting... and as he said "yes that would have improved this" I kind of agree... spelljammer is dumb. It's fun dumb though (IMO) I like the new one okay I just wish we got more rules. again... you misunderstand... even stories I LOVE that are 20,30,50, over 100 years old if remade today I would HOPE they would fix. There is a book I read in HS called "Killing Mr Griffin" and one part about it ages perfectly. The teacher Mr Griffin assigns what his students (and I at the time) thought was impossible. basicly it is to improve on Shakespeare... (add to it but make it work to be exact) and now I realize. Like every writer every story there are flaws... things that years of reading and rereading you can find and even a lesser writer CAN fix. This then turns into a problem some of the writers I know run into... they don't want to hand in a script/manuscript/story because if they let it sit a week then reread it they will find things to fix. They need to learn 'good enough' and that it will never be perfect. I promise my favorite story, your favorite story, and any other story ever put to print if given decades of readers taking it apart and putting it back together you will find things that can be fixed. [/QUOTE]

Verification