Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AnotherGuy" data-source="post: 8805810" data-attributes="member: 7029930">A certain group of old timers would like the setting to acknowledge a particular part of the fandom. WotC has done this offer of goodwill before with their core rule books and some APs by mentioning some of the major D&D settings while really only catering to FR (and later RL).The debate, as I see it, is about representation. It has been done for a myriad other types of minority groups whether it be with NPCs or the artwork. This time it's about the setting. I'm not sure why there is so much pushback to have this included if most people on Enworld are all about being inclusive.And we literally are talking about inserting just a sidebar stating the historical DL setting quirks (i.e. acknowledgement). It is not about mandating a set of rules for all tables.[USER=48135]@Fifth Element[/USER]When someone is offended by x in the RPG, we do not assume they are speaking about their entire demographic because maybe not everyone of their demographic is offended. But the community's general reaction is that is doesn't matter that the entire demographic is not offended. Someone is.</blockquote>