Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8807765" data-attributes="member: 7034611">I assume we are still talking about a scenario where WotC publishes this adventure, not a different one. So while you are not retelling the events we know from War of the Lance, you still need to end up in a very similar scenario.If that is not your intent, then I agree, I missed that, as I assumed we are talking about the adventure WotC is publishing in a month, not some undefined alternative that could also play in the DL setting.At that point this discussion is moot. Why even bring back DL then, you might as well place it in FR.Going back has all the problems people are complaining about in this thread and the other DL thread, whereas moving forward lets them change the setting without retconning anything, and simply tell a story where the events of the War of The Lance matter and are honored, but the setting isn't beholden to just retell them again.Assuming we agree that this discussion is about SotDQ, not some adventure that does not exist, then they are not retelling them either way. They also are not changing the existing events either, as far as we know.The changes we discuss here are essentially making the setting compatible with 5e. I am pretty sure you have the same / similar discussions either way.As I said, I find jumping back much more sensible than jumping forward. That does not require me to not understand you, it simply means I do not agree with you.</blockquote>

Verification