Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8812887" data-attributes="member: 23751">So does Dragonlance.&nbsp; Look at the 1e Dragonlance Adventures hardcover.&nbsp; It lists the monsters encountered on Krynn on the Unified Ansalon Encounter Chart and the vast majority of D&amp;D monsters are not on that list.Why?&nbsp; Why must D&amp;D settings include every option?I'm not.&nbsp; I'm looking a this as a car is a car, whether you buy a Toyota or a Ford. The design intent behind them doesn't matter in the end, because both cars get you to point B just the same.The bolded part is literally the only important thing to a setting.&nbsp; The experience of playing the game is all that matters.&nbsp; If it's the same whether a setting was designed first for MtG or first for D&amp;D, then a setting is a setting is a setting.&nbsp; What went on in the heads of the designers just doesn't matter, nor is what was important to them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8812887, member: 23751"] So does Dragonlance. Look at the 1e Dragonlance Adventures hardcover. It lists the monsters encountered on Krynn on the Unified Ansalon Encounter Chart and the vast majority of D&D monsters are not on that list. Why? Why must D&D settings include every option? I'm not. I'm looking a this as a car is a car, whether you buy a Toyota or a Ford. The design intent behind them doesn't matter in the end, because both cars get you to point B just the same. The bolded part is literally the only important thing to a setting. The experience of playing the game is all that matters. If it's the same whether a setting was designed first for MtG or first for D&D, then a setting is a setting is a setting. What went on in the heads of the designers just doesn't matter, nor is what was important to them. [/QUOTE]

Verification