Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dragonlance: Everything You Need For Shadow of the Dragon Queen
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8817963" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>You seem to think I've having trouble understanding. I'm not. I'm just not agreeing with you.</p><p></p><p>Yes. I bought my copies of the AD&D PHB and DMG in the first half of the 1980s. One of the interesting features of the way that Gygax defines <em>good</em> is that it encompasses the full range of values - life, wellbeing, freedom, truth, beauty are the main ones he mentions - and the full range of moral conceptions - Benthamism (greatest good of the greatest number), human rights, virtue, wellbeing. He doesn't use alignment to distinguish between modernist, rights-based conceptions of good and more theological conceptions that emphasise humility before and obedience to the divine.</p><p></p><p>This is relevant to understanding the place of paladins in the alignment system: they must be LG, and they seek to "take service or form an alliance with lawful good characters, whether players or not, who are clerics or fighters (of noble status)" (PHB p 24). Thus, while the DMG (p 23) tells us that LG holds that "good is best defined as whatever brings the most benefit to the greater number of decent, thinking creatures and the least woe to the rest" - Benthamism, which is hostile to all theological and aristocratic obscurantism - the PHB also assures us that being a knight of the round table, serving a divinely-anointed king and upholding the feudal order.</p><p></p><p>Alignment - at least in its good vs evil dimension - doesn't purport to draw the distinctions that, in the real world, are fundamental to political argument and conflict. It doesn't purport to settle the dispute between the ancien regime and the French revolutionaries.</p><p></p><p>Nonsense.</p><p></p><p>The authors of the setting are not presenting the gods as committing genocide. They're presenting the gods as imposing retribution - collective punishment for the sin of pride.</p><p></p><p>This is a well-known moral conception, consistent with the paladin-esque approach to LG set out in the AD&D PHB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8817963, member: 42582"] You seem to think I've having trouble understanding. I'm not. I'm just not agreeing with you. Yes. I bought my copies of the AD&D PHB and DMG in the first half of the 1980s. One of the interesting features of the way that Gygax defines [i]good[/i] is that it encompasses the full range of values - life, wellbeing, freedom, truth, beauty are the main ones he mentions - and the full range of moral conceptions - Benthamism (greatest good of the greatest number), human rights, virtue, wellbeing. He doesn't use alignment to distinguish between modernist, rights-based conceptions of good and more theological conceptions that emphasise humility before and obedience to the divine. This is relevant to understanding the place of paladins in the alignment system: they must be LG, and they seek to "take service or form an alliance with lawful good characters, whether players or not, who are clerics or fighters (of noble status)" (PHB p 24). Thus, while the DMG (p 23) tells us that LG holds that "good is best defined as whatever brings the most benefit to the greater number of decent, thinking creatures and the least woe to the rest" - Benthamism, which is hostile to all theological and aristocratic obscurantism - the PHB also assures us that being a knight of the round table, serving a divinely-anointed king and upholding the feudal order. Alignment - at least in its good vs evil dimension - doesn't purport to draw the distinctions that, in the real world, are fundamental to political argument and conflict. It doesn't purport to settle the dispute between the ancien regime and the French revolutionaries. Nonsense. The authors of the setting are not presenting the gods as committing genocide. They're presenting the gods as imposing retribution - collective punishment for the sin of pride. This is a well-known moral conception, consistent with the paladin-esque approach to LG set out in the AD&D PHB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dragonlance: Everything You Need For Shadow of the Dragon Queen
Top