NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8818079" data-attributes="member: 67338">Scale and presentation and this isn't a group of arguments this is 1 argument changing any of them can and would change some of the pushback. They didn't nuke a town or an island but the worldThis is said to be a reaction to too much goodThis action has little (I don't think no is the right word) remorseThis action is said to be 1/3 the choice of exemplars of good.what could change this?They didn't nuke a town or an island but the world making it smaller scale, a nukeing of the city MAY stop some form having the issue but then it doesn't really fit the name.This is said to be a reaction to too much good This one REALLY needs a rework. for this to work there needs to be a lot of good being done (not evil that thinks or pretends to be good) and it need a real consequence 'it the world was so good the evil gods were going to do worse then the cataclysm)This action has little (I don't think no is the right word) remorse like the first one this is hard if you have the gods admit it was wrong its hard to call them both gods and good  the 'best' fix would change too much of a central theme of the settingThis action is said to be 1/3 the choice of exemplars of good. this is were i think your best bet is. the good gods need to be forced into this with clear 'we had to kill thousands to save billions' level justification or ' the others were going to wipe out krynn we fought and saved those of you that we could but neutral sided with evil and it was 2-1</blockquote>

Verification