Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Velderan" data-source="post: 8818568" data-attributes="member: 7038056">You and me both. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up    (y)"  data-smilie="22"data-shortname="(y)" />100%, you and I briefly talked about that the other day and I'm insanely curious to see how they handle the whole "you may not end up where you thought you would" bit. Kinda nervous tbh because I don't like things that take away player decision making. We'll see!I think the theme just promotes a constant back and forth that makes conflict eternal essentially. I never had a problem with it, but I certainly can understand your aversion to it.Curious if there will be much for lore or just "Soth can make them because reasons".Death Knights in 5E were already tough, but surely Soth will have legendary actions so what will those be...?Literally none of the game material ever mentioned it, so 100% this book won't either. I really can't think of an example in a novel where females being unable to be knights or similar limitations wasn't coming from an antagonist so seemed like it was just used as an easy way to help the reader figure out who the bad guy was.</blockquote>