Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 8568786" data-attributes="member: 6802378">The tinker gnomes were created as a parody of the engineers (who created more troubles than fixing them), and I can say it because my brother bought the original trilogy with comments by the own authors, and one of these was about the gnomes from Krynn. I read it with my own eyes.Kenders are more like Dennis the menace. The things appearing in their pocket or bag is a secondary effect of their kender ace trait. The kenders need a revision because if we want them to be fun characters then we should avoid typecasting.Maybe the original kenders weren't linked with the Feywild, but when they started to explore this and other worlds, then they current link became stronger.* I guess WotC will publish a handbook and an updated version of the original modules, and adding to the DM Guild to know the reaction by the fandom with the ideas of other authors. * What about the dragonspawns? It is a too intersting concept. * If the timeline of Dragonlance is reseted, then the high humber of novels wouldn't be canon any more, and then not published again.... and becoming valious pieces for the collectors. (I could say the same one about Ravenloft). * WotC would rather all the crunch and fluff in their books could be used by the DMs in their homebred campaigns. Let's imagine somebody who gets inspired by Brom's picture for the cover of "Wild Elves" and then he creates a new setting mixing things from Dragonlance and Dark-Sun. It is better the crunch to be designed to be used by the rest of lines to sell more.</blockquote>

Verification