Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Stefano Rinaldelli" data-source="post: 8572736" data-attributes="member: 6791994">Maybe you miss that we are talking of the association of Kender with Romani. Not the association of Romani with Thievery. Who jumps from Kender to Romani do a false logic assumption.All Romani are thieves, Kender are all thieves, Kender are Romani? NOAll Drow are black, all drow are evil, Black people are evil? NOThese are wrong logic conclusion.This is a fact rooted in logic rules and correct reasoning. Sorry but I'm not anti inclusive if I say that who say this is in error. I don't blame anybody for a logic error, but it remains a logic error and I don't have to change my words to prehevent a logic error.Since it is perfectly possible to distinguish a broken logic conclusion from a real anti-inclusive content, it would be better to take who feels offended and explain them why they are in error or ignore them. The evidence I have is that now Pubishers cut everything: anti inclusive content (for good reasons) AND everything that can be considered anti inclusive if broken logic is applied (for marketing reasons).</blockquote>