Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8573667" data-attributes="member: 7023887">We can all have our cake, eat it too, and also have pizza in this situation. There is no &quot;only publish older settings or completely new ones&quot; dichotomy that you seem to be setting up. For the people that want older D&amp;D settings to be updated to 5e's ruleset, along with changes to the setting to modernize it? Wizards of the Coast is currently making books just for them. For the people that want older D&amp;D settings updated to 5e's ruleset, but don't want any changes to the setting to modernize them? Well, WotC officially publishing them will open up the settings on the DMsGuild, allowing for people that don't like the changes to make their own version of the setting and make money off of it. For the people that want completely original, new D&amp;D settings? Well, Wizards of the Coast is making two currently, which seem pretty likely to be published based on the fact that we've heard them mentioned several times. It's an absolute win-win-win. Michael Scott would be jealous.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8573667, member: 7023887"] We can all have our cake, eat it too, and also have pizza in this situation. There is no "only publish older settings or completely new ones" dichotomy that you seem to be setting up. For the people that want older D&D settings to be updated to 5e's ruleset, along with changes to the setting to modernize it? Wizards of the Coast is currently making books just for them. For the people that want older D&D settings updated to 5e's ruleset, but don't want any changes to the setting to modernize them? Well, WotC officially publishing them will open up the settings on the DMsGuild, allowing for people that don't like the changes to make their own version of the setting and make money off of it. For the people that want completely original, new D&D settings? Well, Wizards of the Coast is making two currently, which seem pretty likely to be published based on the fact that we've heard them mentioned several times. It's an absolute win-win-win. Michael Scott would be jealous. [/QUOTE]

Verification