NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 8574361" data-attributes="member: 6802378">There are changes we can tolerate better and others that make us to feel unconfortable. And that happens with all reboots in the entertaiment industry. We should wonder what changes really help to improve the IP. Today the D&D are being redesigned for a "cosmopolitan market", and this is right, because one of the best things of D&D is players learning to forget the differences and cooperate for a common goal, the color or gender of the cat doesn't mind if this catchs mice. The new Dragonlance is going to add more characters as Theros Ironfeld. In the tabletop Dragonlance is totally different because lots of players know the novels before the modules, and this means they know special spoilers. We shouldn't be surprised if the future modules are retconected to can cause surprise for the players who discovered those spoilers in the novels, like the secret identity of.. I suggest a cameo of Margaret Weiss and Tracy Hickman as nPCs in the modules, but adding a secret, they are watchers (with orders of no-interference) and they work for a different faction. But they presence causes a butterfly effect altering the metaplot.Anytimes to say what you don't like isn't enough, you have to show your own suggestions about how it can be fixed or improved. I have said the mine, to open a door to allow parallel worlds or alternate timeline, where players enjoy more freedom to alter the plot, but we can keep the original continity.* What if chronomancers avoid the Greygem to be broken, causing the war of chaos, but there are evil cults from beyond crystal sphere who want to destroy it to cause the second cataclysm? I miss the chronomancers and the crazy potential to create new stories, but I am afraid if they return, it will one of the last sourcebooks of this edition, when the risk was lower.</blockquote>

Verification