Vigwyn the Unruly
First Post
Ogrork the Mighty said:Uhh, where is the normal attacks info? Are they only including the rage-modified attacks?
No, he left some of the statblock out. Check my next post.
Ogrork the Mighty said:Uhh, where is the normal attacks info? Are they only including the rage-modified attacks?
Vigwyn the Unruly said:No, he left some of the statblock out. Check my next post.
Vigwyn the Unruly said:Is that conceptually possible?
Ranes said:Still, I'd like to see how much space it would take to describe a high level character's abilities in this format before I decide which I prefer.
Yes, it is. The raging strength should be 21. The raging melee attack stats are correct, however.ThirdWizard said:Is the raging strength an error in the origional? It's really bugging me.
Vigwyn the Unruly said:On page 87, there is a Female human undead cleric (Wee Jas) 15. The stat block is two full columns.
Hower, they are really easy to read, so I think it's worth it. Besides, that character would probably have taken nearly that much space in the previous style anyway.
This style does a lot of the work for me, and I think that trading space for less work is a great trade. The easier it is to use the more fun it is to play.
Garnfellow said:Does the new stat block format distinguish between Attack and Full Attack? (I've found that distinction pretty helpful.)
...
Melee +1 greataxe +7 (1d12+5/x3)
Base Atk +3; Grp +6
...