Lord Pendragon
First Post
So it seems the discussion here is whether the dwarven ability should be interpreted as:
A. A dwarf in medium/heavy armor, or medium/heavy encumbrance ignores armor movement penalties.
or
B. A dwarf's movement rate cannot be brought below 20' due to medium/heavy armor/encumbrance.
If it's A, then yes, a dwarven barbarian would have a 30' movement in medium armor, since the +10' would be added to his base movement, and he ignores the -10' due to his medium armor.
If it's B, then no, a dwarven barbarian would still only move 20', since Fast Movement would give him a 30' movement, but the armor could and would bring that back down to 20'.
I'd rule B. The dwarven ability seems specifically worded to mean B, rather than A. A dwarven fighter is in the same boat as a human fighter, if both are wearing full plate. But a dwarven barbarian is also in the same boat as a human barbarian, if both are wearing chainmail.
A. A dwarf in medium/heavy armor, or medium/heavy encumbrance ignores armor movement penalties.
or
B. A dwarf's movement rate cannot be brought below 20' due to medium/heavy armor/encumbrance.
If it's A, then yes, a dwarven barbarian would have a 30' movement in medium armor, since the +10' would be added to his base movement, and he ignores the -10' due to his medium armor.
If it's B, then no, a dwarven barbarian would still only move 20', since Fast Movement would give him a 30' movement, but the armor could and would bring that back down to 20'.
I'd rule B. The dwarven ability seems specifically worded to mean B, rather than A. A dwarven fighter is in the same boat as a human fighter, if both are wearing full plate. But a dwarven barbarian is also in the same boat as a human barbarian, if both are wearing chainmail.