Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 75224" data-attributes="member: 834">I'll admit it would be better if I was using 25 points and 1 bonus attribute every 4 levels.But is my opinion, though, that under such circumstances Ghorgor would be relatively stronger in combat.&nbsp; If STR and CON are reduced accross the board, the ogre gets more value out of his +10 to STR and +4 to CON.And at least I am using CP generation.&nbsp; If you are so quick to dismiss my playtesting based on such a slight variation between PCs, what will happen when the average gamer uses 4D6 to generate PCs?Last time I used this method, two players rolled the following sets;Player A18, 16, 16, 15, 14, 14Player B15, 14, 12, 11, 9, 8Should player A be ECL 2?&nbsp; And what happen if either A or B decides to play a monster?&nbsp; How will they compare?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 75224, member: 834"] I'll admit it would be better if I was using 25 points and 1 bonus attribute every 4 levels. But is my opinion, though, that under such circumstances Ghorgor would be relatively stronger in combat. If STR and CON are reduced accross the board, the ogre gets more value out of his +10 to STR and +4 to CON. And at least I [i]am[/i] using CP generation. If you are so quick to dismiss my playtesting based on such a slight variation between PCs, what will happen when the average gamer uses 4D6 to generate PCs? Last time I used this method, two players rolled the following sets; [b]Player A[/b] 18, 16, 16, 15, 14, 14 [b]Player B[/b] 15, 14, 12, 11, 9, 8 Should player A be ECL 2? And what happen if either A or B decides to play a monster? How will they compare? [/QUOTE]

Verification