Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Egregious TPK retcon in Hoard of the Dragon Queen
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 6358335" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Yes, the one for Starter Set players breaks off after 68 points of damage, the first main adventure breaks off after 24 points of damage.</p><p></p><p>Both dragons do 12D6 with their breath weapon.</p><p></p><p>In the Starter Set, one of the PCs is set up to want to attack the dragon and their are other indications that the PCs should attack the dragon. The players are encouraged to attack.</p><p></p><p>I have no problem with adventure design with a monster that is just too powerful for the PCs to attack. I have a problem with adventure design with a monster that can knock PCs unconscious or kill them in round one if they fail a saving throw (and go unconscious even if they make the saving throw in many cases).</p><p></p><p>That's bad encounter design, I do not care who the author is and I do not care if WotC wrote the product. Just because WotC put it down on paper does not make it a good idea. A simple mistake on the part of the DM like the OP and a lot of time and effort is wasted.</p><p></p><p>I know that the players in my group took 2 hours each to create their PCs. They read through a lot of decision points. People are just not yet familiar with Backgrounds and the revised spells and races and such.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PC death should be due to extremely unlucky dice rolls, stupidity on the part of the players (which I do not agree attacking a dragon is after 14 years of D&D being that way), or due to some extremely heroic sacrifice. It shouldn't be a likely outcome given the most obvious set of actions for many players in the first two adventures designed for the new edition. That's f-ed up.</p><p></p><p>PCs are the protagonists and their lives should not so cavalierly thrown into the waste basket because a game designer wants to prove to everyone that the new version of dragon is not supposed to be messed with. I have no problem with dragons being super uber fighting machines, I do have a problem with the designers throwing those super uber fighting machines at 3rd level PCs. That's stupid encounter design, even for the encounter here that has the dragon run away so quickly. Not every DM (like the OP) necessarily reads or remembers everything written down in an adventure module.</p><p></p><p>DMs are human and it is not that hard to make a simple mistake.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 6358335, member: 2011"] Yes, the one for Starter Set players breaks off after 68 points of damage, the first main adventure breaks off after 24 points of damage. Both dragons do 12D6 with their breath weapon. In the Starter Set, one of the PCs is set up to want to attack the dragon and their are other indications that the PCs should attack the dragon. The players are encouraged to attack. I have no problem with adventure design with a monster that is just too powerful for the PCs to attack. I have a problem with adventure design with a monster that can knock PCs unconscious or kill them in round one if they fail a saving throw (and go unconscious even if they make the saving throw in many cases). That's bad encounter design, I do not care who the author is and I do not care if WotC wrote the product. Just because WotC put it down on paper does not make it a good idea. A simple mistake on the part of the DM like the OP and a lot of time and effort is wasted. I know that the players in my group took 2 hours each to create their PCs. They read through a lot of decision points. People are just not yet familiar with Backgrounds and the revised spells and races and such. PC death should be due to extremely unlucky dice rolls, stupidity on the part of the players (which I do not agree attacking a dragon is after 14 years of D&D being that way), or due to some extremely heroic sacrifice. It shouldn't be a likely outcome given the most obvious set of actions for many players in the first two adventures designed for the new edition. That's f-ed up. PCs are the protagonists and their lives should not so cavalierly thrown into the waste basket because a game designer wants to prove to everyone that the new version of dragon is not supposed to be messed with. I have no problem with dragons being super uber fighting machines, I do have a problem with the designers throwing those super uber fighting machines at 3rd level PCs. That's stupid encounter design, even for the encounter here that has the dragon run away so quickly. Not every DM (like the OP) necessarily reads or remembers everything written down in an adventure module. DMs are human and it is not that hard to make a simple mistake. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Egregious TPK retcon in Hoard of the Dragon Queen
Top