Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Marius Delphus" data-source="post: 2630571" data-attributes="member: 447">Eek. Urgh.I ended up deleting that part of my post when I found I'd made a tiny but critical rules error regarding D&D permanent spells. This DID occur to me. Honestly. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I came up with some possibilities, all of which I gave short shrift because I don't like them. (Probably why I didn't miss them when rereading my post.) My objections are in [brackets]:1. Refund CP to the caster if a permanent spell is dispelled (probably some, but not all) [but this would require nasty, ptooie! bookkeeping!]2. Charge fewer CP for permanent spells [adds math, assumes balance between permanent spells with caveat and items STILL isn't right; would need the most playtesting]3. Require anyone dispelling a permanent spell to have the Craft Permanent Spell feat [doesn't make internal sense]4. Require anyone dispelling a permanent spell to spend CP (of the four, I like this one best) [but how many? and as if there aren't enough uses for CP!]And, well, thanks for the compliment <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification