Ending Viral Disease


log in or register to remove this ad


Just saying that he wants to end all virus diseases sounds suspicious.

On the other hand, maybe this is a new way to get "grant money" without having to jump threw institutional hoops.
 

Just saying that he wants to end all virus diseases sounds suspicious.

Well, he says he has a chemical that will bind with the RNA that viruses use (and that we don't use in that form) that will cause an infected cell to kill itself. It may not kill *all*, but if it works as stated, it would be a pretty broadly effective agent.

On the other hand, maybe this is a new way to get "grant money" without having to jump threw institutional hoops.

I would prefer he state that in the video, then. "We could get funding from corporations or grants, but those take forever and many hours of work - if you fund us, we're finding a cure that much faster!"
 

Well, he says he has a chemical that will bind with the RNA that viruses use (and that we don't use in that form) that will cause an infected cell to kill itself. It may not kill *all*, but if it works as stated, it would be a pretty broadly effective agent.
Just like snake oil!

I would prefer he state that in the video, then. "We could get funding from corporations or grants, but those take forever and many hours of work - if you fund us, we're finding a cure that much faster!"

Which goes back to suspicious.
 

Well, he says he has a chemical that will bind with the RNA that viruses use (and that we don't use in that form) that will cause an infected cell to kill itself. It may not kill *all*, but if it works as stated, it would be a pretty broadly effective agent.

I would prefer he state that in the video, then. "We could get funding from corporations or grants, but those take forever and many hours of work - if you fund us, we're finding a cure that much faster!"

A big problem with targeting agents against tumors is that they are mostly the same as normal cells. The difference between a normal cell and a tumor cell can be a very small thing.

That means that a lethal agent can very easily fail to distinguish tumor cells from normal cells. How does the RNA binding agent obtain an RNA sequence which is specific enough to not kill a lot of normal cells?

If such an agent can be made, wouldn't it be useful for assassinations? Take a DNA swab, surreptitiously (or not) and use it to target one person.

If the proposed agent were as promising as it sounds, I'd think there would be a *lot* of funds available. (And, I'd expect a lot of labs to be pursuing the idea: Why is only this one guy doing research in this area?)

And four years seems too short of a time, and $500,000 a year too little money to bring a drug to market. There would need to be a bunch of trials, which seem likely to cost a heck of a lot more than $500K / year for four years. That seems like it would cover basic research, and barely that.

Thx!
TomB
 

Snake-oil.png

I'd be less cynical if it wasn't both Indiegogo and flexible funding. I know there have been inroads against viruses and all, like Aleeve and one of the flu strains, but this campaign has just chosen one of the less trust-able set ups.
 

That means that a lethal agent can very easily fail to distinguish tumor cells from normal cells. How does the RNA binding agent obtain an RNA sequence which is specific enough to not kill a lot of normal cells?

In this case, very simple - he isn't targeting a specific sequence. He claims the drug targets double stranded RNA, which our bodies *don't* generally use, but viruses do.

I was speaking with my wife about this - she's got a degree in biology and biochemistry, and is a veterinarian.

We can't think of a reason a priori, that the described mechanism can't work. It isn't unreasonable to think someone could build a drug that'll bind to double-strand RNA. It isn't unreasonable to have the other end work on the cell's "kill switch" (which is actually a thing, yes). The basic idea of this seems sound, unlike the stated ideas behind most "snake oil" miracle drugs.

Whether he's got it or not, and whether it works as well as suggested, and has no major side effects, is another question entirely.
 

In this case, very simple - he isn't targeting a specific sequence. He claims the drug targets double stranded RNA, which our bodies *don't* generally use, but viruses do.

I was speaking with my wife about this - she's got a degree in biology and biochemistry, and is a veterinarian.

We can't think of a reason a priori, that the described mechanism can't work. It isn't unreasonable to think someone could build a drug that'll bind to double-strand RNA. It isn't unreasonable to have the other end work on the cell's "kill switch" (which is actually a thing, yes). The basic idea of this seems sound, unlike the stated ideas behind most "snake oil" miracle drugs.

Whether he's got it or not, and whether it works as well as suggested, and has no major side effects, is another question entirely.

Oi, oi! Of course. (Well, actually, I didn't know that about viruses.) But I did mix up viruses with tumors, so duh, and thanks for the correction.

Although ... what exactly is double stranded DNA, if that doesn't mean the two strands that make up regular DNA before it is unzippered to allow protein formation?

Thx!
TomB
 


Remove ads

Top