[ENnies] WotC on the outs

I think that WOTC has kind of shot themselves in the foot lately. ELH and Savage Species (was SS eligible for this ENNies?) were great concepts that could have been must-haves - but based on the reactions of the players, both had flaws that were significant enough to prevent that.

J
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Sure, MotP was a great book, but BoVD and FF see use in just about every single one of my games.

I don't think WotC is necessarily on the out, but their relatively poor showing is probably directly related to their strategy: fewer products, more focus on selling PHBs. And, of course, there was a lot of quality this past year from the d20 market.

Cheers
D
 

Personally, I think the silver win was in the most important category. The website. :)

Malhavoc press has a great website, but the only place where I would think that Monte's website is clearly better than WOTC's website, is in Monte's forums, where there is more support for how a GM should run a super-module (RTTOEE) than I've seen anywhere else on the web.

With regards to the other categories, if they are not nominated, they aren't going to win. So you'd have to talk to the people who made nominations.

I voted, but didn't make any nominations.

SemperJase said:
So what is the deal with WotC's poor showing in the ENnies? Only three nominations and one "silver" win in a minor category.

Is WotC that bad or isit just in vogue to discount them? It seems there is a growing anti-WotC bias in this community. The ENnies seem to indicate that perception is true. WotC is obviously not a favored RPG producer this year.
 

Hmmm. It seems the awards were targeted to those with open d20 content. Makes sense. But that means WotC wouldn't qualify for a lot of stuff. Pity.

I am surprised they didn't win best website. Their site has a ton of free downloads.
 

Was Silver Marches included in the running? Personally I think its one of the strongest supplements (for a setting) I've seen or heard about. Its very heavy on story and flavor, but it does have some crunch.

Technik
 

Derulbaskul said:
Sure, MotP was a great book, but BoVD and FF see use in just about every single one of my games.
Not mine. And, they were surprisingly dry reads to boot. OA and MotP were fascinating; they totally made me want to drop whatever I was playing and do planar adventures, or oriental. And, there's tons to borrow in both, from monsters to alternate classes, etc.
 

SemperJase said:
Is WotC that bad or isit just in vogue to discount them? It seems there is a growing anti-WotC bias in this community. The ENnies seem to indicate that perception is true. WotC is obviously not a favored RPG producer this year.

I think it would be a mistake to suggest that either of those things are true. WotC is not "that bad." Nor is there an anti-WotC bias around here. As Eric pointed out, WotC didn't really qualify for many of the categories.

I'd say, rather, that the excellence of the products put out by so many of the other D20 publishers in the past year is a sign that Ryan Dancy's vision has come to pass. D&D is now safe in the hands of the fans, who are pouring all their love and creativity into it.

Consider, for example, Magical Medieval Society: Western Europe. This is an incredible product, which won three ENnies (if you count the two for the free web product, Magical Medieval City Guide, which is really selections from the book). But it was created by regular gamers, like you and me, who have Real Jobs, and who will probably just make enough money from MMS:WE to finance their next project. Small scale? Sure. But a brilliant piece of work, nonetheless.

No, there is no conspiracy here. Nor is there bias. Instead there is a huge pool of talent, that finally has a shot at sharing their vision with the rest of us. It is indeed a good time to be a gamer.
 

"Please not that the definition of "D20" for the purposes of these awards is any product which cites the D20 System Reference Document in s15 of the Open Gaming License found in that product. "

Tell me this didn't preclude WOTC material because, well, they don't have to post an OGL license.

......

IMO... to even consider for one second that WoTC art is not the best, especially overall, is absurd.

The Unapproachable East was some of Sean's best worked; it clearly stands as a superb world, separate from FR. Take a look.

Best Publisher overall: art, content, volume...how could this not be WoTC?

Best campaign website .. OK, can't beat here....


Anyway I made my point
 

Joshua Dyal said:
I'd agree that Fiend Folio is quite likely the best book WotC did this year. BoVD, IMO, was only OK. Neither approached MotP or OA.

Why do you like FF so much? As I'm converting to 3.5, I'm hesitant to plug down money on FF, but conversions from 3 to 3.5 aren't that hard really. What makes it better than other monster books from other publishers? Maybe I'll change my mind and buy it.
 

Emiricol said:


Why do you like FF so much? As I'm converting to 3.5, I'm hesitant to plug down money on FF, but conversions from 3 to 3.5 aren't that hard really.

FF practically is 3.5 - it uses the new rules for skill ranks and feats, so pretty much the only conversions you'd need to do are type, face->space, and DR. (And they're conveniently listed in the conversion document).

As for monsters, it's got a lot of good extraplanar critters. I didn't get it for a long time, but once I picked it up, I was impressed. I will probably get more use out of it than I will out of MM2.

J
 

Remove ads

Top