driver8
First Post
It just makes no sense why Paramount would let an important moneymaking property be leased or liscensed to another company to produce. ST is going through difficult times now, but the property has made tons of money in the past- why would they want to lessen their grip over how its developed in the future?
Theyll put it on ice, maybe continue with "second tier" properties like games and novels , then thaw out the TV show when interest is back (or when the collective memory of consumers has faded).
EDIT: Instead of fangroups petitioning and gathering money to save the TV series which gets no ratings, we should all sign petitions to stop a ST prequel movie from being made.
Or if the prequel movie gets made, dont go to see it. People like Berman who fans hate is in power cause Trek still makes money- maybe less but it still does. Paramont like other studios looks at the bottom line not necessarily the quality to the product to life long Trekkers.
Theyll put it on ice, maybe continue with "second tier" properties like games and novels , then thaw out the TV show when interest is back (or when the collective memory of consumers has faded).
EDIT: Instead of fangroups petitioning and gathering money to save the TV series which gets no ratings, we should all sign petitions to stop a ST prequel movie from being made.
Or if the prequel movie gets made, dont go to see it. People like Berman who fans hate is in power cause Trek still makes money- maybe less but it still does. Paramont like other studios looks at the bottom line not necessarily the quality to the product to life long Trekkers.
Last edited: