D&D 3.x Errata for 3.5 PHB

[Deimodius]

I'm sorry if this has been covered long before now, but I only just purchased the 3.5 PHB, and when I downloaded the most recent errata from WotC I was surprised to find it is only 1.5 pages. Is this right? Are there really only one and a half pages of errata for the 3.5 PHB? Is there a FAQ as well? Is there somewhere else I can DL a better Errata or FAQ?

 

[diaglo]

you've got it:

errata .... http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20040125a

faq .... http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20030221a

 

[dcollins]

They have generally cut back on the amount of errata they release. Note the very first errata item on "Primary Sources", which fundamentally concedes there will be a bunch of contradictions, and gives a series of rules about how to resolve them on your own.

 

[Deimodius]

Thanks, y'all.

 

[Hypersmurf]

They have generally cut back on the amount of errata they release. Note the very first errata item on "Primary Sources", which fundamentally concedes there will be a bunch of contradictions, and gives a series of rules about how to resolve them on your own.

I like some of the Customer Service answers people have received about Complete Divine, saying "Yes, this one's an exception - in this case, the table is right, and the text is wrong."

I always said a blanket Primary Source rule was a bad idea

-Hyp.

 

[Deset Gled]

I always said a blanket Primary Source rule was a bad idea

I always thought it was a great addition, for exactly the same reason. There is now proof in writing that Custserv is wrong. The fact that they can sit there and still say things like you mention just makes those individuals ignorant as well.

 

[Hypersmurf]

I always thought it was a great addition, for exactly the same reason. There is now proof in writing that Custserv is wrong. The fact that they can sit there and still say things like you mention just makes those individuals ignorant as well.

Unless they've actually talked to the Complete Divine people, and found out that there's a typo in the text... which would make the Primary Source rule wrong

-Hyp.

 

[Darth K'Trava]

Unless they've actually talked to the Complete Divine people, and found out that there's a typo in the text... which would make the Primary Source rule wrong

-Hyp.

A typo?!?!?! Surely you must be jesting, Hypersmurf...... There's enough typos in that book to warrant a new printing (after a new edit job, of course...). That was the only thing that disappointed me with the new book: all the typos.

 

[dcollins]

I like some of the Customer Service answers people have received about Complete Divine, saying "Yes, this one's an exception - in this case, the table is right, and the text is wrong."

I always said a blanket Primary Source rule was a bad idea

I agree completely!