Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rikka66" data-source="post: 8272091" data-attributes="member: 7019937">So the answer to the first question is name recognition, which I'm sure you already knew.I don't think there's a winning choice between &quot;all new domains that are clearly treading the same ground and are meant to be updated version of old domains&quot; and &quot;updating the old domains&quot; if the goal is to avoid upsetting long-time fans. In the first scenario they'll demand to know why they didn't just use the perfectly good old domains and accuse them of trying to erase them. In the second scenario they want to know why they had to change the perfectly good old scenarios and accuse them of trying to erase the prior work.Using the old names is just another way to tread on nostalgia, which is a huge element of 5e from top-to-bottom.Edit: Also I'm not sure what &quot;book equivalent of the Snyder DC Universe&quot; means. Maybe I'm alone in that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rikka66, post: 8272091, member: 7019937"] So the answer to the first question is name recognition, which I'm sure you already knew. I don't think there's a winning choice between "all new domains that are clearly treading the same ground and are meant to be updated version of old domains" and "updating the old domains" if the goal is to avoid upsetting long-time fans. In the first scenario they'll demand to know why they didn't just use the perfectly good old domains and accuse them of trying to erase them. In the second scenario they want to know why they had to change the perfectly good old scenarios and accuse them of trying to erase the prior work. Using the old names is just another way to tread on nostalgia, which is a huge element of 5e from top-to-bottom. Edit: Also I'm not sure what "book equivalent of the Snyder DC Universe" means. Maybe I'm alone in that. [/QUOTE]

Verification