Expensive pussy


log in or register to remove this ad

"ALLERCA has produced the world's first scientifically-proven hypoallergenic cats."

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Doubly so when the claim is intended to push a multi-thousand dollar purchase for a kitten, when there's scores of kittens already looking for homes.

They don't provide any. They assert, but provide no evidence. Looking through their FAQs, I find this:
"Is there information regarding the independent verification of your claims?

We expect a scientific paper to be published sometime in 2007 and we will make the results available at that time."

That's... not exactly convincing.
 

Anyone thinking of buying one of these come see me first, I can get you a cat for half that price. Write me a check and give me a couple days after to get the kitty to you.

People with disposable income like that need to share to those of us with bills- and I am not talking about credit cards that are over the limit, I mean bills.
 

Harmon said:
People with disposable income like that need to share to those of us with bills- and I am not talking about credit cards that are over the limit, I mean bills.

Ducks and platypi, unite!
 



I'll tell you what, last time I paid that much, I swelled up something awful. I would have loved for it to have been allergen free.

What?

It's a cat?


Nevermind.
 


Nyaricus said:
The title is a bit inappropriate (well, more of a WTF? sorta title), but KenM is hardly flaming anyone with it.

Fact is, that if people stopped talking about KenM's past... indulgences, then they really wouldn't be an issue anymore. I never heard tickety-boo about them until someone started talking about it. That's rude.

OTOH, KenM did leave himself open for a reference with a title like that, given his past, but only those in the know would bring it up, as it so obviously was.

--N

I certainly didn't realise that there was a previous history of any sort behind this. I'm intrigued now!

Olaf the Stout
 

Umbran said:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Doubly so when the claim is intended to push a multi-thousand dollar purchase for a kitten, when there's scores of kittens already looking for homes.

They don't provide any. They assert, but provide no evidence. Looking through their FAQs, I find this:


That's... not exactly convincing.

Did you look at the PCRs and Westerns? They look pretty good to me. Seems like after they identifed the Fel d 1 glycoprotein, they went on a massive genome hunt. Sounds like they sequenced lots of cats looking for SNPs or other genetic miscues in the Fel d 1 glycoprotein gene. Once identified they breed those cats to generate homozygous lines that produce Fel d 1 glycoproteins with a modifed chain 1, which is the immunoreactive site interacting with T-cells). The Westerns show a pretty clear degragation of the Fel d 1 glycoprotein. Seems to me they just did some fancy breeding. Along with high-throughput genomics to identify rare genetic mutants of course.

They won't publish until the patent comes out, that's pretty standard. But I think the science shown is sound.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top