Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell Redesigned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 1766008" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Mmm... I am not completely sure about this idea, let me think...</p><p></p><p>Extra Spell as in Tome & Blood wasn't great, I would like it to be changed in Complete Arcane so that you learn a spell up to your current maximum level (not level -1), but I am quite sure it won't be changed.</p><p></p><p>I totally agree that sorcerers should have a way to learn lower level spells (when they already cast high level ones) for a price lesser than a feat, but the rate you suggest sounds pretty high at first thought.</p><p></p><p>I'll try to write down all the combinations (for the moment, not considering cantrips):</p><p></p><p>@lv 4-5</p><p>one 1st spell</p><p></p><p>@lv 6-7</p><p>one 2nd spell</p><p>two 1st spell</p><p></p><p>@lv 8-9</p><p>one 3rd spell</p><p>one 2nd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>two 1st spells</p><p></p><p>@lv 10-11</p><p>one 4th spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>two 2nd spells</p><p>one 2nd spell + two 1st spells</p><p>four 1st spells</p><p></p><p>@lv 12-13</p><p>one 5th spell</p><p>one 4th spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + two 1st spells</p><p>two 2nd spells + one 1st spell</p><p>one 2nd spell + three 1st spells</p><p>five 1st spells</p><p></p><p>@lv 14-15</p><p>one 6th spell</p><p>one 5th spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 4th spell + one 2nd spell</p><p>one 4th spell + two 1st spells</p><p>two 3rd spells</p><p>one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + three 1st spells</p><p>three 2nd spell</p><p>two 2nd spells + two 1st spells</p><p>one 2nd spells + four 1st spells</p><p>six 1st spells</p><p></p><p>@lv 16-17</p><p>one 7th spell</p><p>one 6th spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 5th spell + one 2nd spell</p><p>one 5th spell + two 1st spells</p><p>one 4th spell + one 3rd spell</p><p>one 4th spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 4th spell + three 1st spell</p><p>two 3rd spells + one 1st spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + two 2nd spells</p><p>one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + two 1st spells</p><p>one 3rd spell + four 1st spells</p><p>three 2nd spells + one 1st spell</p><p>two 2nd spells + three 1st spells</p><p>one 2nd spells + five 1st spells</p><p>seven 1st spells</p><p></p><p>@lv 18-20</p><p>one 8th spell</p><p>one 7th spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 6th spell + one 2nd spell</p><p>one 6th spell + two 1st spells</p><p>one 5th spell + one 3rd spell</p><p>one 5th spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>two 4th spells</p><p>one 4th spell + one 3rd spell + one 1st spell</p><p>one 4th spell + two 2nd spells</p><p>one 4th spell + one 2nd spells + two 1st spells</p><p>one 4th spell + four 1st spells</p><p>two 3rd spells + one 2nd spell</p><p>two 3rd spells + two 1st spells</p><p>one 3rd spell + two 2nd spells + one 1st spell</p><p>one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + three 1st spells</p><p>one 3rd spell + five 1st spells</p><p>four 2nd spells</p><p>three 2nd spells + two 1st spells</p><p>two 2nd spells + four 1st spells</p><p>one 2nd spell + six 1st spells</p><p>eight 1st spells</p><p></p><p>Well I think it would work, but it's a very good feat however and highly versatile. I would probably allow it in my campaign, but in that case I would restrict the amount of wands and staves available for players. In a low-magic-items settings it will be very welcome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 1766008, member: 1465"] Mmm... I am not completely sure about this idea, let me think... Extra Spell as in Tome & Blood wasn't great, I would like it to be changed in Complete Arcane so that you learn a spell up to your current maximum level (not level -1), but I am quite sure it won't be changed. I totally agree that sorcerers should have a way to learn lower level spells (when they already cast high level ones) for a price lesser than a feat, but the rate you suggest sounds pretty high at first thought. I'll try to write down all the combinations (for the moment, not considering cantrips): @lv 4-5 one 1st spell @lv 6-7 one 2nd spell two 1st spell @lv 8-9 one 3rd spell one 2nd spell + one 1st spell two 1st spells @lv 10-11 one 4th spell one 3rd spell + one 1st spell two 2nd spells one 2nd spell + two 1st spells four 1st spells @lv 12-13 one 5th spell one 4th spell + one 1st spell one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell one 3rd spell + two 1st spells two 2nd spells + one 1st spell one 2nd spell + three 1st spells five 1st spells @lv 14-15 one 6th spell one 5th spell + one 1st spell one 4th spell + one 2nd spell one 4th spell + two 1st spells two 3rd spells one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell one 3rd spell + three 1st spells three 2nd spell two 2nd spells + two 1st spells one 2nd spells + four 1st spells six 1st spells @lv 16-17 one 7th spell one 6th spell + one 1st spell one 5th spell + one 2nd spell one 5th spell + two 1st spells one 4th spell + one 3rd spell one 4th spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell one 4th spell + three 1st spell two 3rd spells + one 1st spell one 3rd spell + two 2nd spells one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + two 1st spells one 3rd spell + four 1st spells three 2nd spells + one 1st spell two 2nd spells + three 1st spells one 2nd spells + five 1st spells seven 1st spells @lv 18-20 one 8th spell one 7th spell + one 1st spell one 6th spell + one 2nd spell one 6th spell + two 1st spells one 5th spell + one 3rd spell one 5th spell + one 2nd spell + one 1st spell two 4th spells one 4th spell + one 3rd spell + one 1st spell one 4th spell + two 2nd spells one 4th spell + one 2nd spells + two 1st spells one 4th spell + four 1st spells two 3rd spells + one 2nd spell two 3rd spells + two 1st spells one 3rd spell + two 2nd spells + one 1st spell one 3rd spell + one 2nd spell + three 1st spells one 3rd spell + five 1st spells four 2nd spells three 2nd spells + two 1st spells two 2nd spells + four 1st spells one 2nd spell + six 1st spells eight 1st spells Well I think it would work, but it's a very good feat however and highly versatile. I would probably allow it in my campaign, but in that case I would restrict the amount of wands and staves available for players. In a low-magic-items settings it will be very welcome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell Redesigned
Top
