• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Fantasy Recommended Reading


log in or register to remove this ad

Trying not to repeat anything that's already been mentioned..

The Dark is Rising Sequence, by Susan Cooper

Changling/Madwand by Roger Zelazny

Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wyn Jones

All of Terry Brook's stuff (the various Shannara series, Magic Kingdom of Landover, the Word/Void series.)

The Last Unicorn, by Peter S. Beagle

Depending also on how you define fantasy, or what type of fantasy your looking for, also everything by Ray Bradbury, especially the October Country collection. He's often refered to as a science fiction writer, but what he writes is actually primarily fantasy.

Madeline L'Engle's "Time Quartet" (A Wrinkle in Time, a Wind In the Door, A Swiftly Tilting Planet and Many Waters)

Everything by Lovecraft.

And various stuff already mentioned. Earthsea, Prydain, etc.


Also, although I enjoyed all of the Eddings's stuff (well, both the Belegariad/Mallorean and the Elenium/Tamuli, along with Belgarath the Sorcerer and Polgara the Sorcereress) I would suggest stearing clear of the Rivan Codex. It contains a lot of the background notes and ideas for the Belgariad/Mallorean, but it also contains a lot of thoughts and opinions of the author which I often found annoying and unpleasant and sort of put me off the stories. Your mileage may of course vary though.
 



Oh, and another recommendation:

Dante's Divine Comedy

If reading this doesn't give you at least a hundred ideas for your D&D game, then you're just not paying attention. ;)
 

I've only seen one person recommend Elizabeth Moon's Deed of Paksenarion series and I can't see why; it's miles better than 90% of what has been listed here.

For my money, I can't stand, but can kind of see the appeal of, Jordan or Vance; and I can't understand why anyone likes Eddings' schlock. Stay far, far away from the latter, no matter how many people tell you otherwise. And stay away from any explicit game tie-ins, too, no matter how much of a D&D fan you are.

My family are very keen on Brust, but I haven't read any of his stuff. The world certainly sounds interesting, and very D&D with, for example, relatively easy resurrection.
 
Last edited:

jeffh said:
I can't understand why anyone likes Eddings' schlock.
Because sometimes schlock is fun to read, especially when it doesn't take itself too seriously. It's like watching a crappy action movie: you know it's crap, but it's still fun to watch bad guys get shot and see stuff blow up.

I would much rather read Eddings' breezy, light-hearted, schlocky fantasy books than any number of other authors' turgid, self-important works.
 

jeffh said:
I've only seen one person recommend Elizabeth Moon's Deed of Paksenarion series and I can't see why; it's miles better than 90% of what has been listed here.

This is a pretty common type of thread. She gets mentioned in every one of them, too. Generally when I see one person mention a book I like, I don't mention it again to prevent the thread from getting crowded with too many 'me too!' posts. But I'll go ahead and reccomend her again. In fact, it's the only book I'd ever consider handing to a player and saying 'read this before you ever play a Paladin'.

jeffh said:
My family are very keen on Brust, but I haven't read any of his stuff. The world certainly sounds interesting, and very D&D with, for example, relatively easy resurrection.

That's because they are D&D, at the core :) Brust's novels read like what a very well-run campaign should sound like, with a GM who isn't afraid to break some genre tropes. You know the old saw about 'well, if elves are so cool, why aren't they in charge?'. In the Vlad Taltos books, they are. Vlad is what we would call a human, from the eastern lands, but almost everyone around him is a Draegarian (what Vlad's people call 'faerie'; they, of course, refer to themselves as 'human'). There are several different types of magic (Vlad himself uses both witchcraft and Imperial sorcery; other use priestly magic or psionics - and use those terms).

The easy ressurection thing does come into play a couple times. Vlad gets killed, his friends get him resurected, etc. And then there are the Morganti weapons, which prevent ressurection because they kill the soul as well as the body. Nasty things.
 

Huw said:
Unless you object to reading children's/young adults' books, I'd add:

Weirdstone of Brisingamen by Alan Garner. He's done others, but that's his best
Artemis Fowl series: Artemis Fowl, The Arctic Incident, The Eternity Code, The Opal Deception by Eoin Colfer, plus some spin-offs.

I'd like to point out that Garner wrote a sequel to Weirdstone, called The Moon of Gomrath, which was much darker but just as good, if not better. I always thought there should be a third book in the series, but there never was.

Plus, there's now a fifth Artemis Fowl book: The Lost Tribe. A bit more mature than the others, and by far the best in the series so far.

For other entertaining children's/young adults books, try The Squire's Tales by Gerald Morris: retellings of the Arthurian legends from the point of view of the knights' squires, damsels and younger brothers.

I also enjoyed the Einarinn series by Juliet E. McKenna. I haven't read her other books yet, but I've heard they're good too.

For something completely different, and very confusing, I recommend the Scavenger trilogy by K.J. Parker, with the caveat that it's very badly edited. And I'm not just talking about typos here: the wrong names are used, or familial relationships confused, stuff like that. Like I said, it's a confusing series to start with, and with things like that added in it keeps you guessing right until the very end (someone mentions that his brother was killed, then later it turns out to be his cousing, so you're wondering whether he's hiding something). But it was an interesting read if you like your fantasy dark and gritty.
 
Last edited:

and I can't understand why anyone likes Eddings' schlock



The books themselves are well written, relatively creative and enjoyable.

Its Eddings himself, and some of his opinions and attitudes that I have a problem with, especially as expressed in the Rivan Codex. And now that I know those things I see them reflected in the books a lot more, which has made them less enjoyable for me. I loved them when I first read them; the appeal has lessened somewhat because of what I've learned about the author's take on things.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top