Feat Prerequiste

[AGGEMAM]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

Just pointing it out because above in the thread someone mentions a +6 Manual of Quickness of Action.

That was me, and it is true the maximum inherent you can get is +5, but since the question was whether or not it was diffecult to get a natural ability score of 25 for a player character, which it is not, since you could easy gain such a score, even without the use of continiuos magic items.

 

[kreynolds]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

That was me, and it is true the maximum inherent you can get is +5, but since the question was whether or not it was diffecult to get a natural ability score of 25 for a player character, which it is not, since you could easy gain such a score, even without the use of continiuos magic items.

Hey, it's cool. Crothian was just pointing out your big-a$$-blunder in referring to a figment-of-your-imagination +6 manual/tome. Don't get all pissy just because you screwed up. No biggie. Happens to everyone.

 

[AGGEMAM]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

Hey, it's cool. Crothian was just pointing out your big-a$$-blunder in referring to a figment-of-your-imagination +6 manual/tome. Don't get all pissy just because you screwed up. No biggie. Happens to everyone.

Hmm ...

Care to re-read my post, please, I agreed that I made mistake, but couldn't see how that had any relevance at all to the discussion, furthermore I really can't see how your snippy remarks here serve any purpose.

 

[kreynolds]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

Care to re-read my post, please,

OK. Just did.

I agreed that I made mistake, but could see how that had any relevance at all to the discussion

Wait a minute. You said "but could see how that had any relevance", but did you really mean to say "but couldn't see that that had any relevance"? I don't think I'm getting what you're trying to say here.

furthermore I really can't see how your snippy remarks here serve any purpose.

Oh. I should probably explain that. I noticed a bit o' nasty behavior around here at about that time, and I started reading this thread. Then I hit your comments and it just kinda boiled over from there, but I didn't blow up or anything. You were basically being an ass to Crothian for no particular logical reason. You stated that his correcting you had no relevance on this subject. I think it did. This thread is about rules. You posted an incorrect rule (+6 tome), which if used as is, would lead only to an incorrect result. Besides, it could also lead to confusion.

Everyone is wrong once in a while, but it's no big deal. Just don't bite off someone else's head just because of your own mistake.

That's all I'm sayin'.

 

[AGGEMAM]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

Yeah, it should be 'couldn't', it's now edited.

Everyone is wrong once in a while, but it's no big deal. Just don't bite off someone else's head just because of your own mistake.

That's all I'm sayin'.

I have never said or implied that I was couldn't make mistakes, hell I make a lot of them, though I generally catch most of them with the 'Preview Reply' option.

The reason why the relevance of the correction is quite low is that the difference is insignificant, whether you end up with a natural ability score of 30 or 31 doesn't really matter, when the requirement was a score of 25.

Now I know Crothian has been here for quite a while just as I have, and I think he is quite capable of fending for himself, if he annoyed by my remarks.

As for the biting off heads remarks .. hmm .. "don't throw stones" right?

 

[kreynolds]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feat Prerequiste

Yeah, it should be 'couldn't', it's now edited.

Thanks. That clears that up.

I have never said or implied that I was couldn't make mistakes

I never said that you said or implied that you couldn't make mistakes.

The reason why the relevance of the correction is quite low is that the difference is insignificant, whether you end up with a natural ability score of 30 or 31 doesn't really matter, when the requirement was a score of 25.

It doesn't really matter. To someone less familiar to the rules, a misunderstanding of the rules is a misunderstanding of the rules, even if _you_ do actually know how the rules work. Crothian was just putting out the fire before it started. That's what makes it relevant.

Now I know Crothian has been here for quite a while just as I have, and I think he is quite capable of fending for himself, if he annoyed by my remarks.

I'm sure he is. But that's not the point. Had he addressed the issue, I wouldn't have bothered. But he hadn't yet. Besides, it's a free world, bubba.

As for the biting off heads remarks .. hmm .. "don't throw stones" right?

When I do "throw stones", I generally apologize for it, especially when I find that I was in the wrong. It's called humility. When I'm not in the wrong, an apology usually isn't on the way.