Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Feat/Skill based magic for 3e (brainstorm)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike Sullivan" data-source="post: 784050" data-attributes="member: 9824"><p>Under this conception, are the skills (say we have one for every school, because that's an existing construct in the game and is thus easy) ever rolled? Or are they just used to track what level the character has achieved?</p><p></p><p>Okay, so let's say that you had the skills:</p><p></p><p>Abjuration, Conjuration, Divination, Enchantment, Evocation, Illusion, Necromancy, and Transmutation.</p><p></p><p>Now, it seems tempting to say, "Okay, they're all class skills for Wizard. There are eight skills, so we'll give him six extra skill points per level. That way, he can either max himself in all but two schools and ignore those two, or be a little less than max in all schools. We won't roll these skills, we'll just use their rank levels as prerequisites for wizard abilities."</p><p></p><p>However, at this point, the crocodile hunter jumps on-screen and yells, "Danger! Danger!" We can't give the Wizard six extra skill points per level -- that's a total infringement of the Rogue's niche. Furthermore, this allows the Wizard to trade off normal skills (which aren't really all that powerful) for the ability to max out <em>all</em> schools of magic -- obviously a bad idea, since a couple of skill points per level is clearly unbalanced with "gaining access to an entire school of spells."</p><p></p><p>So we end up protecting these skills, saying that the Wizard can't buy them with normal skill points, and, conversely, can't buy normal skills with his "special" skill points... And at that point, I've got to ask what the point is in calling these things "skills" at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There are ways that you might limit uses per day based on skill effects (if you fail a cast, you can't attempt any magic again for ten minutes per point you failed the roll by, for example), but that doesn't work via the D&D spell system, because skills don't scale quickly enough. We've got to somehow get from the point where, at first level, first level spells are the effective limit of what you can cast (beyond, perhaps, some extremal results) to, at 18th level, 9th level spells are relatively possible to cast. There's only a difference of a +17 to your roll there -- not even the range of a whole d20! That effectively means that there's <strong>no way</strong> to tie a skill roll at DC whatever to casting a spell, unless you want to accept the notion that an 18th level caster will always have a 15% or greater chance of failing to cast a 3rd level spell -- which seems ridiculous to me.</p><p></p><p>Seriously, I don't think that the D&D skill system is capable of this. Not without massive amounts of blood and guts, at least. It's probably technically possible to tear around a vast number of exclusive skills, synnergy bonuses, and class-special-abilities in order to force a system that makes a d20 + whatever >= DC system to work, but, honestly, I can't see it being something that anybody would be willing to slog through.</p><p></p><p>So what we're left with out of a feat/skill system is maybe a couple of simple "tracking" skills (that are largely unrolled, or are even used for other purposes -- like basing all this off Spellcraft), and then feats. But I don't think that there's a way to make that work either. Feats are too infrequently gained (for non-Fighters), too "small" (each one doesn't cover enough ground, if you want to balance against existing Feats), and too, I don't know, isolated in time to cover the complexities of the existing spell system. You'll end up breaking it up into unwieldy chunks that will, I predict, either be overpowered (everyone will always get Wizard-equivalency-feats), or underpowered (nobody would bother to get Wizard-equivalency-feats except for people following the Wizard class, who get them as bonus feats).</p><p></p><p>The former breaks the game, the latter removes the point of the entire exercise, which was to somehow make the magic system accessible through something other than "taking Wizard (or whatever) levels."</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry, I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade. I just don't see how it can be done within the framework of feats and skills. Please, prove me wrong!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Sullivan, post: 784050, member: 9824"] Under this conception, are the skills (say we have one for every school, because that's an existing construct in the game and is thus easy) ever rolled? Or are they just used to track what level the character has achieved? Okay, so let's say that you had the skills: Abjuration, Conjuration, Divination, Enchantment, Evocation, Illusion, Necromancy, and Transmutation. Now, it seems tempting to say, "Okay, they're all class skills for Wizard. There are eight skills, so we'll give him six extra skill points per level. That way, he can either max himself in all but two schools and ignore those two, or be a little less than max in all schools. We won't roll these skills, we'll just use their rank levels as prerequisites for wizard abilities." However, at this point, the crocodile hunter jumps on-screen and yells, "Danger! Danger!" We can't give the Wizard six extra skill points per level -- that's a total infringement of the Rogue's niche. Furthermore, this allows the Wizard to trade off normal skills (which aren't really all that powerful) for the ability to max out [i]all[/i] schools of magic -- obviously a bad idea, since a couple of skill points per level is clearly unbalanced with "gaining access to an entire school of spells." So we end up protecting these skills, saying that the Wizard can't buy them with normal skill points, and, conversely, can't buy normal skills with his "special" skill points... And at that point, I've got to ask what the point is in calling these things "skills" at all. There are ways that you might limit uses per day based on skill effects (if you fail a cast, you can't attempt any magic again for ten minutes per point you failed the roll by, for example), but that doesn't work via the D&D spell system, because skills don't scale quickly enough. We've got to somehow get from the point where, at first level, first level spells are the effective limit of what you can cast (beyond, perhaps, some extremal results) to, at 18th level, 9th level spells are relatively possible to cast. There's only a difference of a +17 to your roll there -- not even the range of a whole d20! That effectively means that there's [b]no way[/b] to tie a skill roll at DC whatever to casting a spell, unless you want to accept the notion that an 18th level caster will always have a 15% or greater chance of failing to cast a 3rd level spell -- which seems ridiculous to me. Seriously, I don't think that the D&D skill system is capable of this. Not without massive amounts of blood and guts, at least. It's probably technically possible to tear around a vast number of exclusive skills, synnergy bonuses, and class-special-abilities in order to force a system that makes a d20 + whatever >= DC system to work, but, honestly, I can't see it being something that anybody would be willing to slog through. So what we're left with out of a feat/skill system is maybe a couple of simple "tracking" skills (that are largely unrolled, or are even used for other purposes -- like basing all this off Spellcraft), and then feats. But I don't think that there's a way to make that work either. Feats are too infrequently gained (for non-Fighters), too "small" (each one doesn't cover enough ground, if you want to balance against existing Feats), and too, I don't know, isolated in time to cover the complexities of the existing spell system. You'll end up breaking it up into unwieldy chunks that will, I predict, either be overpowered (everyone will always get Wizard-equivalency-feats), or underpowered (nobody would bother to get Wizard-equivalency-feats except for people following the Wizard class, who get them as bonus feats). The former breaks the game, the latter removes the point of the entire exercise, which was to somehow make the magic system accessible through something other than "taking Wizard (or whatever) levels." I'm sorry, I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade. I just don't see how it can be done within the framework of feats and skills. Please, prove me wrong! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Feat/Skill based magic for 3e (brainstorm)
Top