Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fencing
This opinion never ceases to amaze me (nothing personal). The basis of requiring Ambidexterity for the Duelist class on the fencing match between Wesley and Inigo, I mean. Now, mind you, I fully believe even WotC felt this was one of the main reasons to include it as a prereq.
What baffles me is how people can attribute the Ambi feat to either character. Quite the opposite. It is quite clear neither one of them was ambidextrous.
If they were, then fighting with their left hand would have made no difference. The whole point to Inigo wanting to fight left handed was to handicap himself. There would be no handicap if he were ambidextrous.
Likewise, Wesley's fencing skills were equally lessened by his use of his left hand as well. He chose to fight left handed because Inigo did, basically.
For this reason, I removed the feat as a prerequisite and replaced it with Skill Focus (Tumbling).
Anyway, that's my take.
"Inconcievable!"
Theovis said:The main reason for the Ambidexteriy prerequisite is so that he can go, "Hah hah! I am NOT left handed!"
This opinion never ceases to amaze me (nothing personal). The basis of requiring Ambidexterity for the Duelist class on the fencing match between Wesley and Inigo, I mean. Now, mind you, I fully believe even WotC felt this was one of the main reasons to include it as a prereq.
What baffles me is how people can attribute the Ambi feat to either character. Quite the opposite. It is quite clear neither one of them was ambidextrous.
If they were, then fighting with their left hand would have made no difference. The whole point to Inigo wanting to fight left handed was to handicap himself. There would be no handicap if he were ambidextrous.
Likewise, Wesley's fencing skills were equally lessened by his use of his left hand as well. He chose to fight left handed because Inigo did, basically.
For this reason, I removed the feat as a prerequisite and replaced it with Skill Focus (Tumbling).
Anyway, that's my take.
"Inconcievable!"
