Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charles Dunwoody" data-source="post: 5810346" data-attributes="member: 17927">I find it interesting that BS is being called on my comment about the wizard not charging into combat, but I never said I was talking about the 4E wizard. Interesting assumption that it had to be 4E there. I wonder why that assumption was drawn? In fact, I never said that it doesn't work that way in all editions now and the trend just continues. Odd response really, assuming I was picking on 4E!I wrote several examples of where I was coming from and what I experienced within what my NDA allows. The game played differently from both 4E and 3.5 which is in my mind a good thing, as these rules were bare bones. The mix of all editions was there, 1E to 4E, and I've played them all. I have years of writing at rpg.net both in my column and as a reviewer. I have no need to BS and no one to impress. I was just excited to share my play experience, just like i have many times before.</blockquote>