Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
First Impressions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guyanthalas" data-source="post: 5920788" data-attributes="member: 73919"><p>I find it funny how many people say "its like 3e mixed with 4e" and how many are also saying "This is a lot like 2e...". Just kind of fun, and I guess that means that they did some of their job correctly? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> (For the record, it feels like 2e to me).</p><p> </p><p>I'm in favor of the simplification to a lot of things, but I have several greivences. </p><p> </p><p>The biggest thing that stands out to me is the lack of defenses. We are now back to AC only (yes yes, with the saving throws, i get it). I happened to like the flavor and variety the different defenses added. This skill has a lower to hit, but it hits will... so that means it will work more often on most opponents! Just felt like a more diverse system that way.</p><p> </p><p>Regarding the saving throw gripe: This sounds like a lot more DM dice rolling. Before, if my creature was attacked I looked up a number. Now I have to roll dice and compare. Not a fan. Maybe houserule a static defense based on stats?</p><p> </p><p>Rolling for HP? Really? I can't count how many times I've lied about my roll regarding that...</p><p> </p><p>*4e Flag-Waving* I think new players will have a harder time with this system. I play a game with a bunch of our wives / girlfriends who have hardly played any D&D before, and 4e is complicated to them in a lot of respects. While I tip my hat to the "classic" feel, i'm worries its not newbie friendly enough.</p><p> </p><p>If trivial checks are "checks the players shouldn't have to roll" then why are they listed with a DC? I like the idea of less checks, and am going to incorporate the idea into my 4e game.</p><p> </p><p>I both love and am fearful about Advantage / Disadvantage. It seems pretty awesome out the gate, but as someone pointed out, could be a bit swingy for a d20's worth of chance. HOWEVER! My Inner-DM cannot wait for a social encounter where my players have just presented their best case to an important person trying to persuade them, and all I say is "Roll 2 twenties, and give me both the results". I think I can see the sweat dripping now... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devil.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil:" title="Devil :devil:" data-shortname=":devil:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guyanthalas, post: 5920788, member: 73919"] I find it funny how many people say "its like 3e mixed with 4e" and how many are also saying "This is a lot like 2e...". Just kind of fun, and I guess that means that they did some of their job correctly? ;) (For the record, it feels like 2e to me). I'm in favor of the simplification to a lot of things, but I have several greivences. The biggest thing that stands out to me is the lack of defenses. We are now back to AC only (yes yes, with the saving throws, i get it). I happened to like the flavor and variety the different defenses added. This skill has a lower to hit, but it hits will... so that means it will work more often on most opponents! Just felt like a more diverse system that way. Regarding the saving throw gripe: This sounds like a lot more DM dice rolling. Before, if my creature was attacked I looked up a number. Now I have to roll dice and compare. Not a fan. Maybe houserule a static defense based on stats? Rolling for HP? Really? I can't count how many times I've lied about my roll regarding that... *4e Flag-Waving* I think new players will have a harder time with this system. I play a game with a bunch of our wives / girlfriends who have hardly played any D&D before, and 4e is complicated to them in a lot of respects. While I tip my hat to the "classic" feel, i'm worries its not newbie friendly enough. If trivial checks are "checks the players shouldn't have to roll" then why are they listed with a DC? I like the idea of less checks, and am going to incorporate the idea into my 4e game. I both love and am fearful about Advantage / Disadvantage. It seems pretty awesome out the gate, but as someone pointed out, could be a bit swingy for a d20's worth of chance. HOWEVER! My Inner-DM cannot wait for a social encounter where my players have just presented their best case to an important person trying to persuade them, and all I say is "Roll 2 twenties, and give me both the results". I think I can see the sweat dripping now... :devil: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
First Impressions?
Top