Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 6805676" data-attributes="member: 205">Feat-like.&nbsp; Obviously (and I do mean obviously, as in I shouldn't have to point this out) each individual ability would be far less powerful than the feats currently in the rules, just as the core ability in the Actor feat is much less powerful than the core ability of Sentinel.I don't particularly want a complex fighter to be a skill monkey.&nbsp; Although a complex rogue class with various skill tricks would also be interesting.They obviously aren't defined in the rules, because we're discussing hypotheticals.&nbsp; And the bulk would be combat abilities, because this a complex fighter.&nbsp; And I'm sure there would be overlap with other classes, because every class overlaps each other.&nbsp; There aren't very many &quot;one class only&quot; spells in the PHB, if you look.&nbsp; The class I'm picturing doesn't really have much of a support role, so it doesn't seem to overlap with the Class-who-must-not-be-Named you're speaking of.&nbsp; It's more about understanding the blind spots much of the community has in regard to pigeonholing complexity to narrative archetypes.&nbsp; There's nothing wrong with a D&amp;D where casters know but a a few iconic magical abilities, and warriors learn a myriad of fighting techniques.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TwoSix, post: 6805676, member: 205"] Feat-like. Obviously (and I do mean obviously, as in I shouldn't have to point this out) each individual ability would be far less powerful than the feats currently in the rules, just as the core ability in the Actor feat is much less powerful than the core ability of Sentinel. I don't particularly want a complex fighter to be a skill monkey. Although a complex rogue class with various skill tricks would also be interesting. They obviously aren't defined in the rules, because we're discussing hypotheticals. And the bulk would be combat abilities, because this a complex [B]fighter[/B]. And I'm sure there would be overlap with other classes, because every class overlaps each other. There aren't very many "one class only" spells in the PHB, if you look. The class I'm picturing doesn't really have much of a support role, so it doesn't seem to overlap with the Class-who-must-not-be-Named you're speaking of. It's more about understanding the blind spots much of the community has in regard to pigeonholing complexity to narrative archetypes. There's nothing wrong with a D&D where casters know but a a few iconic magical abilities, and warriors learn a myriad of fighting techniques. [/QUOTE]

Verification